In PA, judges changed election laws, not legislators. The change allowed additional ballots to be cast after polls closed. Even if those votes are real, they're illegally cast per the law. That's how I understand it at least. Is there another way to interpret that?
In some cases it was the governor, not even judges. Yes, these were illegal changes according to PA law, but my hopes that a PA court will overturn are slim. And I’m not sure SCOTUS will step that far into PA law.
They can only be considered to cast “illegally” when a court makes such determination. And that case has already been litigated up to PA Supreme Court so as of now these “illegal” votes are very much legal.
In PA, judges changed election laws, not legislators. The change allowed additional ballots to be cast after polls closed. Even if those votes are real, they're illegally cast per the law. That's how I understand it at least. Is there another way to interpret that?
In some cases it was the governor, not even judges. Yes, these were illegal changes according to PA law, but my hopes that a PA court will overturn are slim. And I’m not sure SCOTUS will step that far into PA law.
They can only be considered to cast “illegally” when a court makes such determination. And that case has already been litigated up to PA Supreme Court so as of now these “illegal” votes are very much legal.