2655
Comments (34)
sorted by:
34
xxxMAGA420xxx 34 points ago +34 / -0

It's possible this happened, after they threw away all the republican ballots.

32
TheNewRepublic 32 points ago +32 / -0

It will be easy, find the 900 and confirm their vote

20
orange_dit 20 points ago +20 / -0

But what if there were more ballots and they just threw out the Trump votes? Then recounting gets the same cherry picked batch of votes. They need a full audit. How many military people voted and how many of their votes arrived.

1
weltbild 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ask military people on deployment who life in fullton but are overseas.

I think somebody already was asking around. "Biden" stealing military votes would be a godsend for Trumps case

4
POTUS_DonnieJ 4 points ago +4 / -0

They only need to find 1 that voted Trump to invalidate the number.

21
the-new-style 21 points ago +21 / -0

There was supposedly a 38% swing to Biden in Military mail-in ballots - yeah, OK, that sounds realistic !

10
BarrensChat 10 points ago +10 / -0

They must be so bored from not getting sent to war. They know Beijing Biden will have them dodging bullets in no time.

6
Thinice 6 points ago +7 / -1

With Fulton County having a large minority military presence, it’s very likely that the 600 were Biden votes and they just threw away the Trump votes.

2
THELEADERSOFMEN 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah but think about Roswell and Alpharetta. They’re Fulton county too.

6
1Jungle77Dan6 6 points ago +7 / -1

If anyone thinks the military is conservative, I have some bad news- lots of damage done by turning it into a social experiment, lots of PR brainwashing- both higher ranks (officer and enlisted) are corrupted to where it is easily 50-50 if not worse.

13
wildcat1020 13 points ago +13 / -0

But 100% of any demographic over 50 people to agree on one candidate is not freaking likely, let alone 900. Statistically 100% does not seem realistic or natural.

6
1Jungle77Dan6 6 points ago +6 / -0

I didn't mean in context of the vote, I meant in the sense of defending the against domestic enemies

2
wildcat1020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely- I think maybe I was just thinking and I put my comment a bit misplaced as a response to yours! My bad pede!

11
Tallsie 11 points ago +11 / -0

The enlisted are generally not interested in politics, or conservative. You have some Democrats, but those are usually the snitches and people you would shove into lockers in a highscool setting.

5
Reddinatored 5 points ago +5 / -0

Meh... am mid level. 10-1 Trump. The 1 wouldn’t admit he wasn’t. If anything we are the mirror mirror of society. Commies tend to not want to out themselves in an organization that is supposed to hate them.

General and Flag grade officers, you might be close on your 50/50. That’s where it becomes political.

3
ArchbishopofKekistan 3 points ago +3 / -0

50/50, not the above mentioned 100%. Your point? And yes, I was one of those socialist dumbasses while I was in.

2
1Jungle77Dan6 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't mean in context of the vote, I meant in the sense of defending the against domestic enemies

Obama's lackeys further politicized / social-experimented the military- I'm saying don't count on clear lines or decisive support from that quarter

2
Ballind 2 points ago +2 / -0

The percent chance of 900 coin tosses all going heads has 270 leading zeros. The mix is irrelevant.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
Keln 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, most military are conservative to begin with. It's why they volunteer to serve. Yes, there are a lot more leftys in the military now that there are a lot of tech jobs. But the actual soldiers, sailors, marines are by far conservative.

4
A_Colostomy_Bag 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's about as low as you can get, stealing votes from serving military!

4
RedPillDispenser 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just put out a call for any military voter who voted for Trump.. Every single one of them was disenfranchised by having their vote NOT counted.

3
Honor+Duty 3 points ago +3 / -0

I remember lots of Trump signs from military members. There were conversations about weather this was legal in military terms. Commander in chief.

2
monkey_inna_tree 2 points ago +2 / -0

Survey says: Highly Unlikely

2
Batshitcrazy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I disagree that the military has gone liberal. Lots of young people of military age are actually libertarians. I dont exactly think you have snowflakes terrified of covid joining the military right now either. Also keep in mind your legal address is where you joined the military unless you change it. I dont know one young person who has joined military to be anything other than conservative.

1
StaryHickory 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still majority conservative and whatever you say about the military they are not likely extremist leftists though it can happen and I have seen it. The officer core though is a problem. I have seen some huge red flags with officers.

You take a history major from a commie institute and give him a commission and you are just asking for it. They would be better off promoting strictly from the mid to senior enlisted ranks to the officer core.

The whole idea of officers is that they were the only ones able to read and write effectively and possessed certain minimal standards for leadership. Now that shit is out the door, the military expects these same qualities from the enlisted core and they expect you to have an educuation.

They need to do away with the college educated losers becoming officers. Many of them do it when they can't get a job with their degrees. For fucks sake keep them out of the military.

2
Keln 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol what?

Nobody gonna believe that one.

2
wildcat1020 2 points ago +2 / -0

indeed. ridiculous. send all 900 to testify, Trump!

1
sentinel20 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this is true, it's virtually statistically impossible. Even assuming that, in Fulton County, the military preferred Biden 75%/25%, the odds of this is about 3.6 * 10^-111 percent. Even if the military in Fulton County preferred Biden 99%/1% (which itself is an almost impossible result), the odds are only 1%. Not a believable result.

What those who claim "there is no fraud" don't realize, is that in real-life scenarios, it's extraordinarily rare to find instances where a given population supports one candidate >90% of the time. Even in the most heavily Democratic precincts it's rare to find the Democrat candidate take more than 85% of the vote.

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do we have a source for this beyond a tweet?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
LugNuts 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes, there is a chance; because THAT happened.