The OP's picture shows faults from suite 5.2. The source in the comments shows the test report on suite 5.5-A, which lists corrections made to faults in suite 5.2 and 5.5 in order to meet state election standards. Am I missing something, or is the OP missing something?
Based on the State Requirements and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission Voting System Testing and Certification Program from September of 2020, each state must either meet the HAVA baseline level of certification or, at the strictest level, require that voting systems are certified by the appropriate federal agency responsible for testing and certification of compliance with federal voting system guidelines.
For example, Florida only has to meet HAVA baseline certification, where "the Department of State, Division of Elections, establishes minimum standards for certification and provisional approval for voting systems, and the Department of State adopts rules that establish minimum security standards for voting systems."
On the other hand, Georgia requires federal certification, and that the proposed voting system's hardware, firmware, and software
must be issued Qualification Certificates from the EAC.
But that goes back to my first question that you keep deleting from the comments section: Why are you posting a picture of a test report based on an older release of the dominion suite (5.2) regarding USB's, in addition to the other problems in the dominion suite 5.5, when the EAC test report for domionion suite 5.5-A shows those issues being corrected? What the hell am I missing?!
I'm not trying to argue or find faults in your post just for the sake of it, I'm trying to see the big picture.
The OP's picture shows faults from suite 5.2. The source in the comments shows the test report on suite 5.5-A, which lists corrections made to faults in suite 5.2 and 5.5 in order to meet state election standards. Am I missing something, or is the OP missing something?
My question is, what are the state election standards? And where can you find them? Federal standards are voluntary. https://www.eac.gov/voting-equipment/system-certification-process
State by state EAC election standards and requirements for voting machines can be found here: https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/TestingCertification/State_Requirements_for_Certification09042020.pdf
Based on the State Requirements and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission Voting System Testing and Certification Program from September of 2020, each state must either meet the HAVA baseline level of certification or, at the strictest level, require that voting systems are certified by the appropriate federal agency responsible for testing and certification of compliance with federal voting system guidelines.
For example, Florida only has to meet HAVA baseline certification, where "the Department of State, Division of Elections, establishes minimum standards for certification and provisional approval for voting systems, and the Department of State adopts rules that establish minimum security standards for voting systems."
On the other hand, Georgia requires federal certification, and that the proposed voting system's hardware, firmware, and software must be issued Qualification Certificates from the EAC.
But that goes back to my first question that you keep deleting from the comments section: Why are you posting a picture of a test report based on an older release of the dominion suite (5.2) regarding USB's, in addition to the other problems in the dominion suite 5.5, when the EAC test report for domionion suite 5.5-A shows those issues being corrected? What the hell am I missing?!
I'm not trying to argue or find faults in your post just for the sake of it, I'm trying to see the big picture.
I’m not the original poster.