2572
Comments (25)
sorted by:
43
ztrich007 43 points ago +43 / -0

109% of all new registered voters.

MSM: Nothing to see here folks

17
PNW_PEPE 17 points ago +17 / -0

Listen fat, excitement for joe was so high, even the palmist voted for him

8
TheJimmReaper 8 points ago +8 / -0

Face Psalm ??‍♂️

2
mrd92 2 points ago +2 / -0

☝️Underrated comment right here.

34
MrGreggle 34 points ago +34 / -0

Wow, 82 D 20 R ratio? Couldn't settle for 80D 20 R?

9
fade04 9 points ago +9 / -0

The 2 D 20 R ratio of new votes is probably what really happened and they just added 4x the Trump vote on top of it.

5
Whitedogs 5 points ago +5 / -0

They did this on purpose. I fiddled my high school elections. My EGO made it such that if you added up all the totals it was more than 100%. Just because I had the power to do so. Its exactly what you are seeing here.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
19
Trump2k20 19 points ago +19 / -0

Scumbags

14
ShaeforTrump 14 points ago +14 / -0

Damn! We can’t allow this.

14
IJustWannaLurk 14 points ago +14 / -0

Oops. Had to push the red button a few too many times.

11
bigdragonenergy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Another day another piece of evidence proving the fraud.

6
t-ara-fan 6 points ago +6 / -0

Very blurry screenshot. Can you save to .png

6
JamesClarker [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

The source image can be found on page 9 of Att 12 (exhibit 102) here:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18693929/king-v-whitmer/

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

I second this!

5
MagaChamp253 5 points ago +5 / -0

Any idea of every county in the country is begin parsed like this? I'd love to see how it shakes out nation wide...

3
MastaJoda 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good read!

2
johndude 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't understand how this data was calculated and what the columns mean.

Take precinct 13 for instance

  • new Trump: 37
  • new Biden: 312
  • new Total: 251

Can we explain what the columns means and how they are calculated? Why is "New Total" lower than "New Trump + New Biden"?

This is the biggest problems I find in this whole document, they say a lot of things and then they say "as demonstrated by the following chart", and then no explanation. Well sorry but no, it doesn't demonstrate anything without explanation.

3
JamesClarker [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's because the 3rd party data isn't shown. For instance, the sum of the trump and Clinton numbers from 2016 doesn't equal the total because 3rd party isn't listed. I would agree it is a little tough to follow.

A couple weeks ago, I looked at Wisconsin and Michigan. I applied the distributions from 2016 to the new voters and increased turnout, the only way I could get to where Biden is vote wise is if I applied the entire 3rd party difference between 2016 and 2020 to Biden (6-some percent vs 1-some percent if I remember correctly). That was pretty dubious to me.

0
johndude 0 points ago +1 / -1

Makes sense, thanks for the clarification!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
AlwaysTrumper2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

I assume this is Michigan, but again, if so the wording is not right. This has to be the CITY of Troy, largest in Oakland county (just north of Wayne County/Detroit). Troy Township is in west Michigan, and has less than 300 people.

If it is the city of Troy, certainly something is rotten. The mayor is a Republican, but at the state level Dems flipped the house and senate seat last fall after long serving Republicans, and has a Dem in the US house since 2018, after being an R seat before, but he was a Rino/non-Trump supporter who "retired".

0
xBigCoffinHunter 0 points ago +1 / -1

These are the clearest signs of fraud. You’d have to be a complete idiot to not see how more votes than voters is clearly fraud. Turnout in the 80’s they can brush away with bogus excuses, but 100%+ turnout just can’t happen.