These seem like legal 1st amendment limitations, with an emphasis on civility. I was on Gab for a while. That was a great example of what you get with "no rules." You would love it there, OP.
Parler has to have a set of guidelines of course, or you would have anarchy inside the company. Ut I would try out to see exactly what they mean by "false rumors", it does sound like twitters "ban all things that has to do with conservative viewpoints" type of rule, but if we dont try it out we wont know if parler is doing the same as twitter. If you can share Sidney powells lawsuit on parler or even talk about it on there , then I would think its safe to assume they know the laws of what is an actual rumor or what is an actual legal issue in reality unlike Twitter. Parler is under attack from the left so there must be something they hate about it, and frankly, whatever the left is against im practically for. Lol. But once I get on parler ill test these theories out myself to see what exactly they would censor for. I know if I had a platform I would censor certain things as well but only if it dealt with porn, drugs, or murder, anything that is common sense to ban or censor.
I dont understand what they are censoring. I guess thats my question. Im seriously asking what they censored to make others think they can't be trusted. All I hear is good from that platform. I know they censor what they should but is there something they censored that they shouldn't have? I'm seriously curious.
Just need an email address and phone number. People freak out about the phone number thing but Twitter has started locking new accounts in the first few days and requiring a phone number to unlock them.
I suppose you could get the anon SMS numbers online. Twitter was kind of smart with that after awhile they started using an algorithm to detect block SMS providers, then you could use a google phone number.
Parler is worse because they play the fox news rope a dope and require more user identification
Source? This reads like the BS article that came out bashing the product with false info from William “Pepperoni Nipples” Legatte.
It's an MSN article
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/what-is-parler-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-conservative-social-network/ar-BB1aQTqG
it is no secret that parler enforces "civility rules"
That’s exactly what it is.
How about instead of shilling for Twitter, you actually look up and read their guidelines and make your own informed decision?
None of those are accurate at all.
https://legal.parler.com/documents/guidelines.pdf
https://legal.parler.com/documents/Elaboration-on-Guidelines.pdf
nah they are accurate
These seem like legal 1st amendment limitations, with an emphasis on civility. I was on Gab for a while. That was a great example of what you get with "no rules." You would love it there, OP.
Gab=Anarchy Twitter=Dictatorship Parler=Civil Debate
"These seem like legal 1st amendment limitations"
you admit it
"with an emphasis on civility."
just switching your censor lol
The evidence, admittedly so far, confirms my statement. Enjoy Gab, pede.
Enjoy the Fox News of social media platforms
Parler has to have a set of guidelines of course, or you would have anarchy inside the company. Ut I would try out to see exactly what they mean by "false rumors", it does sound like twitters "ban all things that has to do with conservative viewpoints" type of rule, but if we dont try it out we wont know if parler is doing the same as twitter. If you can share Sidney powells lawsuit on parler or even talk about it on there , then I would think its safe to assume they know the laws of what is an actual rumor or what is an actual legal issue in reality unlike Twitter. Parler is under attack from the left so there must be something they hate about it, and frankly, whatever the left is against im practically for. Lol. But once I get on parler ill test these theories out myself to see what exactly they would censor for. I know if I had a platform I would censor certain things as well but only if it dealt with porn, drugs, or murder, anything that is common sense to ban or censor.
poor deflection, parler is shit anybody who defends it doesnt want free speech but a censor more in their favor
I dont understand what they are censoring. I guess thats my question. Im seriously asking what they censored to make others think they can't be trusted. All I hear is good from that platform. I know they censor what they should but is there something they censored that they shouldn't have? I'm seriously curious.
they censor whatever they want in whatever way they want
Dude. Even TDW has rules. like:
Be Respectful
Be respectful to fellow The Donald community members.
How come you're not pointing this out of TDW?
Why you only attacking parler while posting on a site with similar rules of engagement?
TDW got rules but TDW is not a free speech social media platform like gab and pocketnet.app or telegram
the question is: why you only attacking parler while posting on a site with similar rules of engagement?
unless you're claiming gab allows for child porn..........
https://mashable.com/article/what-is-parler-explainer/
you don't even have the balls to post where you got your news from
Doesnt parler make you take like 3 pictures of your face to join?
No. They require a copy of photo ID to become verified.
You can join without being verified though?
Just need an email address and phone number. People freak out about the phone number thing but Twitter has started locking new accounts in the first few days and requiring a phone number to unlock them.
I suppose you could get the anon SMS numbers online. Twitter was kind of smart with that after awhile they started using an algorithm to detect block SMS providers, then you could use a google phone number.
No
social security number
Ok, now everyone here knows you're a fucking dolt that bought a fake story.