Absolutely they’re the next controlled opposition. Honestly I think shills keep advertising it here because the Clinton foundation donations should be an instant Donald disqualified.
I feel the same, globalists see fox's use is running out, so newsmax was mysteriously and almost suddenly propped up as the new main conservative news??
Why have we given up on oann? Or at least stopped using them primarily.
He gave money to the Democrats and then he destroyed them, Newsmax gave money to them and are still shilling for them. I mean, suck Newsmax's dick all you want dude, but quit getting butthurt when I point out how much money they gave to the Clintons
angriasian seems to be shilling for fox news because it's butthurt they've lost customers to newsmax, that's about it. Ruddy is doing what any clever person would've done in his place, even Trump pretended he was friends with the Clintons at some point, for instance: https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/07/28/426888268/donald-trumps-flipping-political-donations and what does it tell us? That before you go to war, you learn as much as you possibly can about your enemy and the best way of doing so is playing nice with them. Smooth-brained morons exist regardless of politics, it's impossible to have them understand various tactics and strategies used in warfare, especially when it comes to intelligence.
I mean, you wanna stick with a brand, be my guest, just pointing out that they're in bed with the Clintons and have given zero dollars to any Republicans
Newsmax is Commie shit, just look at how much money they gave to the Clintons while giving ZERO to Republicans. They also call Biden, President Elect
Absolutely they’re the next controlled opposition. Honestly I think shills keep advertising it here because the Clinton foundation donations should be an instant Donald disqualified.
I feel the same, globalists see fox's use is running out, so newsmax was mysteriously and almost suddenly propped up as the new main conservative news??
Why have we given up on oann? Or at least stopped using them primarily.
The shills are downvoting you, we must be over target.
Don’t know about your other claims but this is factually false.
Your statement is factually false new account: https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2015/02/19/report-newsmax-ceo-donates-1-million-to-clinton-foundation/
Nothing in that article disputes his claim that they didn't call Biden President Elect.
Wat?
Trump donated to democrats before he ran, now what?
He gave money to the Democrats and then he destroyed them, Newsmax gave money to them and are still shilling for them. I mean, suck Newsmax's dick all you want dude, but quit getting butthurt when I point out how much money they gave to the Clintons
Nowhere in that article does it say Newsmax calls Biden the “President Elect,” which is the claim of yours that I challenged.
Shame people just because they’ve created an account here within the last two weeks, brilliant. Really helps the cause.
angriasian seems to be shilling for fox news because it's butthurt they've lost customers to newsmax, that's about it. Ruddy is doing what any clever person would've done in his place, even Trump pretended he was friends with the Clintons at some point, for instance: https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/07/28/426888268/donald-trumps-flipping-political-donations and what does it tell us? That before you go to war, you learn as much as you possibly can about your enemy and the best way of doing so is playing nice with them. Smooth-brained morons exist regardless of politics, it's impossible to have them understand various tactics and strategies used in warfare, especially when it comes to intelligence.
Hey, shill whose account is only three months old:
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/995928
My accounts actually over a year old, and that article is from over 20 days ago.
Nope, it's true. Heard it with my own ears. Dunno who the guy was, some swarthy lookin type.
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/995928
Just because one person on a channel, whoever that is, may have called him that once, doesn’t mean “Newsmax calls Biden the President-Elect.”
Newsmax as an organization, as a matter of official policy, does not call him that.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2015/02/19/report-newsmax-ceo-donates-1-million-to-clinton-foundation/
I mean, you wanna stick with a brand, be my guest, just pointing out that they're in bed with the Clintons and have given zero dollars to any Republicans
Doesn't really matter what the employees do when the people at the top are crooked: https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2015/02/19/report-newsmax-ceo-donates-1-million-to-clinton-foundation/
Didn’t know this