7983
Comments (452)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
ajoed3 2 points ago +2 / -0

I saw Seb Gorka playing a clip from Laura Ingraham's show where she said: 1) there are massive scandalous probs with the election we need to uncover; 2) this won't be "enough" votes to "overturn" the election. 3) I'd be lying to you if I said there was a good chance.

She's a gaslighter who must have bought into whatever her producers told her and is not an independent thinker, but, IMO...What a total liar, she's not dumb enough to believe that. This is simple fucking math and understanding of the legal rules.

If you call into question even one of the red-flag vote dumps which were hundreds of thousands for Biden after observers were expelled and they were 99.4% Biden, that alone is enough of a difference to switch the election.

People already showed if mail-in ballot rejection rates were similar to past elections, Trump wins handily. And this is something that can be verified and changed according to the law, because this WAS the law according to the real state authorities, the legislatures.

Even if you couldn't determine the exact fraudulent ballots or their number, Trump even has the option of convincing the legislature to use electors for him, if the security of the process had enough doubt (particularly if the reason for lack of verification came from the opposing party). It's fallacious to say we need an exact number, if you're paying attention. But we can get sufficient numbers either way. Just using Laura's behavior as an example, but to see someone who seemed red pilled go this route indicates a strong propaganda push at Fox. tl;dr can confirm they are dead. They will soon be a worthless asset appealing to the 100 Jeb Bush voters.