Just posting this because I didn’t see it in here. If The Military is testifying in Sidney Powell’s Michigan Fraud case that’s a real big deal.
Original article link: https://thepalmierireport.com/us-military-intel-agents-ready-to-testify-in-dominion-scandal/
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf
Iran and China had direct connections into the servers
This is a Sworn Affidavit by the guy
All the exhibits van be found here https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18693929/king-v-whitmer/
This affidavit is actually weak if you look into the details and know how SpiderFoot works.
Following claims in the affidavit are not true:
Also, vps2.edisonresearch.com pointing to an IP that is now used by BMA captial (speaking of BMA, the have connections to Pakistan and perpahs Iran too) is suspicious but does not prove anything (could be just a same hosting provider and edisonresearch did not remove DNS record after they stopped using the server). Yes, it's suspicious but does not prove anything.
There is no proof of dominionvotingsystems.com relation to Dominion Voting - yes it is suspicious that someone registered that domain in 2011 already, but they could claim it's just chinese scammers.
Why is whois provided as screenshot from twitter ??
Why is that screenshot of CHINA Unicom China169 provided?
That robtex search is for a different domain (!) it is for xn--iran.tk (not .ir (!))
The dvscopr domains listed in this section are not registered. Those could be false positives from SpiderFoot.
台灣 is Taiwan, not china, this mistake is understandable but easily provable even to a layman and can lead to throwing the affidavit completely.
Overall it's an interesting analysis but should have been double checked, there are several mistakes that discredit the findings (not sure if that's on purpose or sloppy work regarding ruling out false positives).
Paragraph 7. is also interesting saying they got passwords of 7 employees (if true) and would indicate they have much more info than publicly shared. We will see, but this affidavit actually disappointed me, sloppy with obvious big mistakes - compare that to Hunter's leak where we get the emails with DKIM signature headers so there is no doubt at all it's real and tons of other undisputable evidence.
Thank you for this. My tech side of me felt like this affidavit didn’t really drop any bombshells. We can hope this person has more to share in court but as of now it doesn’t convince me yet.