451
Comments (13)
sorted by:
10
Zude 10 points ago +10 / -0

They took it down, not due to any inaccuracy in the information presented, but because it was being used in a way that spread "disinformation" (that's JH's stated reason). So any TRUE piece of information that goes against the chosen narrative will be censored. Glad our overlords are "following the science" (preventing the coverage of facts that undercut the logic of whatever perverse plans they have).

4
Kraken6969 4 points ago +4 / -0

....and it's gone

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Kraken6969 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
inspir3dgenius 3 points ago +3 / -0

I went to the link in the blog but it was 404

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
QuantumReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Duh

2
MetalRiddle 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a little misleading. While the methodology is correct that you have to look at excess deaths, the implication that there are no significant excess deaths is simply not true. Although the total number IS only a little higher than a bad flu year..

https://public.tableau.com/profile/dataviz8737#!/vizhome/COVID_excess_mort_withcauses_11252020/WeeklyExcessDeaths

2
Marshall 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, the chart does not say anything about total number of deaths from year to year. It just shows the percentage of total deaths allocated to each category. But you can see that the baseline of deaths from other causes remains stable indicating that the actual death numbers won't be too far out of the norm.

The actual death totals would be far more interesting.

1
1
Marshall 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is indeed a far more interesting chart. Now do suicides and see if there is a similar pattern. The cure may be a problem.