289
Comments (18)
sorted by:
12
slaphappy2 12 points ago +12 / -0

I don't know anything about this guy - but I do know one thing.

Congress created that law - it's their job to get rid of it.

And it is our job to replace Congress - and we are not doing our job.

9
meme_warrior_76 9 points ago +9 / -0

How can we if the elections are rigged?

6
ProphetOfKek 6 points ago +6 / -0

Correct. We showed up in force.

1
slaphappy2 1 point ago +2 / -1

In theory the President would replace the heads of DOJ and FBI and put in non-deep-state types who would go out and arrest the riggers for violation of Federal election law.

In practice, no - we can't do anything except hope the SCOTUS gives Trump four more years by rolling back the Big Steal - and then hope he starts hiring non-deep-state guys.

4
5121313 [S] 4 points ago +6 / -2

A Previous Post of Mine... Where's 230 ruling Ajit? Get off your Ass! Are YOU a DEEP STATER? 10/15/20 "FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced his decision to move forward with a rule making to reform Section 230 as Twitter & Facebook censored a New York Post article."How many Election Censorship Examples DO YOU NEED? There's 1000's! (www.breitbart.com Also Info:FCC will move to regulate social media after censorship ... https://www.theverge.com/2020/10/15/21518097/fcc-social-media-censorship-moderation-ajit-pai-section-230-nypost-biden — Ajit Pai (@AjitPaiFCC) October 15, 2020 On Thursday, Pai said that the commission's general counsel said that "the FCC has the legal authority to reinterpret Section 230."

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
7
5121313 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well I wasn't one of "em.. I've had my suspicions about him all along.. He was a Big-Telecom Lacky before becoming FCC Chairman.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
11
Mishabird 11 points ago +11 / -0

The FCC can’t repeal 230 but they can determine if somebody is acting as a platform or publisher and remove their protections.

7
5121313 [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Well DUH.. I Agree! That's what is being demanded, make 230 completely irrelevant in providing Big Tech ANY publisher protections. Let the Lawsuits Roll....

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Sum_devil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well someone with a better interpretation of the law needs to get made into chairman.

The interpretation of our laws by some on the left have gone from reasonable to unreasonable to 🤡 🌎 .

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
4
5121313 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe we can make it a 2fer and Add Sundar Pichai - Google CEO, back with Him.!

1
CommieCrats 1 point ago +1 / -0

low brow

-1
teerex1982 -1 points ago +4 / -5

He’s Indian they are all commies

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1