I tried to post this in the actual thread, but my post was insta-banned by an automod or something. (Only shows up in my account.)
https://thedonald.win/p/11QSCIzSCZ/huge-dominion-tried-to-defend-th/c/
The source given in the sticky is incorrect. The report in the screenshot is from testing done for the State of California. It can be found by searching for Document No. DOM-17002-CSTR-01 (link below)
https://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/vendors/dominion/ds52-sc.pdf
The report linked in the sticky is for a different test with different testing parameters that didn't include the same vulnerability testing or assessments. There are a number of these test reports available, but it is important to note the scope of the tests conducted when comparing them to each other.
Note that despite the vulnerabilities reported, the California Secretary of State’s Office of Voting Systems Technology Assessment released a report that gave the following conclusion.
The Dominion Democracy Suite 5.2 voting system, in the configuration tested and documented by the Installation and Use Procedures, meets all applicable California Voting System Standards and Elections Code requirements.
(source)
https://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/vendors/dominion/ds52-staffreport.pdf
This report also mentions the vulnerabilities, so they knew what they were approving for use there. (President Trump won in California?)
Do we not need correct sources to throw in the faces of our enemies as their cuckolds weep and wail over the loss of their manhood? In other words… would someone please fix this shit since messaging the mods apparently does nothing?
Please remove this post if/when the correction is made.
Agreed, we do need good sources. “Hurt me with the truth, but never comfort me with a lie.”