You can’t revoke the 230 section by an EO. What needs to happen is someone who has been defamed on Twitter to sue and include Twitter as a necessary party and argue they are a publisher.
Because these big tech companies have lots of money. There has been a case I believe filed that tried to argue (rightfully) that YouTube was acting as a publisher.
Most people when they file defamation have to prove damages. It can be difficult to do.
The law suits would bury them. Go for it. This would have to go to the supreme court, where they would lose.
You can’t revoke the 230 section by an EO. What needs to happen is someone who has been defamed on Twitter to sue and include Twitter as a necessary party and argue they are a publisher.
Because these big tech companies have lots of money. There has been a case I believe filed that tried to argue (rightfully) that YouTube was acting as a publisher.
Most people when they file defamation have to prove damages. It can be difficult to do.