Pretty much sums it up. This anon may have nailed the exact script/timing of events.
(media.patriots.win)
🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by HeinzTobler
+2005 / -0
Comments (71)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
Front
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
I'd prefer the SCOTUS just start tossing out illegal ballots and handing the election in several states to Trump. Would be safer than having the House decide. Just too many Rhinos in the House.
I thought it was fist bump Lindsey Graham not Mitch
It was..
They are senate anyways we are talking the house.
The house doesn’t decide, the state houses decide and each state gets one vote.
The House decides the election, but each states House delegation has 1 vote. So California's 53 Congressmen collectively have one vote and Wyoming's 1 Congressman has one vote.
And Wyoming’s Rep Liz Cheney is on the payroll of China. We need an activist campaign to pressure her to support Trump.
Sidney Powell may have the goods on Cheney, but we cannot let out guard down.
BEWARE OF RINO TRAITORS
She would never, Biden is going to take Grandpa Vader out retirement.
Well, it looks like she PAID for election insurance or her election results were fixed using SCORECARD maybe to blackmail her. Her win margin fits the template for the SCORECARD "tiers" that have been identified so far.
Oh no doubt.
I find it hard to believe anyone would want to keep a Cheney in. There are still alot of normie GOPs out there though.
We need to really work to get the rot out of the GOP.
That’s right it’s the delegation. Is that made up of the state legislators?
Yeah ok I said state legislators but the poster above said the delegation of each state. Not sure if that’s primarily made up of the legislators.
I think there is some confusion in terminology. The members of the US House of Representatives are Federal legislators, but are commonly referred to as Congressmen, or Representatives. Each state has a delegation based on it's population. When people people say State Legislators they mean a member of a State's Legislative Branch not a member of the Federal Congress. When people say State Houses they mean the State Legislature. In the event no Presidential Candidate secures an Electoral College majority the US House of Representatives votes for the President under the rules described above.
Got it thanks. How is each state’s delegation determined?
The Census every 10 years determines state population and then House seats are apportioned to states by population. Each State is guaranteed atleast 1 Representative and there are 435 House seats total. The State Legislatures then have to draw districts within their states and then the Districts directly vote for a Congressman. So Texas has 36 Representatives this means 36 Congressional District that each vote for a Congressman. Then those 36 members Constitute the Texas Delegation to the House of Representatives.
During the Electoral College tie breaking scenario if a House delegation is split 50/50 like Pennsylvania which currently has a 9 - 9 split Democrat and Republican if neither Candidate can get a majority of a delegation to vote for them neither gets the vote. A candidate needs a majority of delegations which is 26 out of 50. The House just keeps voting over and over again till a candidate wins. Until that happens the Vice President becomes acting President who is elected in this scenario by simple floor vote in the Senate. Currently the GOP has 26 delegations although I've heard they took control of another delegation, or two after the election. Not sure on the final number. I know it is the next Congress that votes in that scenario.
Thanks for the solid info.
Yup. And dig up the fraudsters, public executions for sedition/insurrection.
With ya.
Truth
1st. Hope the scotus votes 5/4 2nd. Hope the house delegation doesn't put a knife in your back, like the current GOP does
Many things still can go wrong unfortunately.
Biggest threat are the Rinos - always will be. Should call them Benedict Arnolds
They would have to have majority, each state only gets one vote and it goes by simple majority. So it’d take more than one turn coat for most states. At this point, the pressure we need to apply is biblical to our representatives!
They literally have to vote by majority in each state. They cannot vote outside of party lines
We won’t be waiting for any mid terms
Some considered to be u n a t u r a l
This is missing a step. Trump drains the Swamp, locks up traitors. I would say that is step 2 maybe 3.
If u lock them up, they cant vote against you either
Please God - let this happen.
Given what we have seen from the GOP lately, I expect enough state legislatures to give Biden the win.
There would be honest to goodness right wing deathsquads. In Fortnight.
Why would SCOTUS vote to push to House? Can't SCTOUS just rule themselves that Trump won?
From what I understand the main contention is mail-in-ballots. From what I understand those can be differentiated from regular ballots. Also each county stores their own ballots so they are further separated that way. The Supreme Court for example could rule that all the mail-in-ballots in Detroit are void do to state election law violations and unequal treatment under the 14th Amendment and have those specific ballots just thrown out. The reason I think this is more likely is throwing out a whole states election is a far bigger ask and I think they'd prefer rulings that can remedy the situation with as little impact as possible. Removing illegal ballots is a far smaller ask than throwing out a whole election and removing so many ballots alone is a huge ask to begin with.
Yes I think certain states/counties ran the election unconstitutionally and their well is poisoned so to speak. Obviously everyone knows there was fraud but I don’t think that avenue is necessary w SCOTUS
i'd feel better if the states did it, the SC and Congress are unknowns.
I think the State Houses are a less reliable quantity. I don't think they want to be labeled as ignoring the will of the people in their state and Republican majorities in many of these state houses are not very big. It doesn't take a lot of defectors. I think it would take a court case tossing out large swaths of illegal ballots to legitimize changing how the electors vote. I think the best case scenario before a court case is they could refuse to certify the results and send Electors until the litigation has run it's course. If this holds out till the 14th The state might just not award it's votes to anyone. They could justify this by saying state election laws were violated and can't certify the results of an illegally conducted election.
Any violence with a Trump win will be far less than doing away with elections aka installing Biden. You’re talking about urban looting versus potentially full scale conflict.
This, pede. I'm with you 100%. I don't doubt that, when all of the smoke clears, Trump will be declared the winner, some time between now and January 20th. However...on the day that he is declared the winner, the libtards will riot in major cities across the country, burning Seattle, Portland, SF, LA, Detroit, Milwaukee, NYC to the ground.
Damn straight, the sheep have been conditioned to think Biden has already won, and if Trump gets the win he did it illegally, they will burn the country down, and whatever remains will be ungovernable for 4 years under Trump. I still want him to win cause fuck them! But shit will get real.
OMG ITS A LARP NO WAY BAN THIS GUYS SERIOUSLY u/fishyPussy
please fucking THIS
ALL I WANT FOR CHRISTMAS IS A HOUSE DELEGATION!!!!!!
This is a political problem created by legal issues (crimes). The Court can resolve the legal issues, but the political problem can only be solved by political bodies. There are THREE political bodies that can solve the political problem:
The dems best hope it's not the last. If Trump gets an excuse to call out the militia and has no choice and does, then we will come out and it will be game over in the most dramatic way.
What discussion board is that?
I want to get to "entire msm and social media melts down" quickly. It's going to be Epic!
Pede, where did you get this anon post from?
According to constitution, vote goes to house only if no candidate reaches a majority of electoral votes. Since, there are only 2 major candidates, this would require a tie of electoral votes. SCOTUS is not going to send it to the house.
I wasn't sure about the impirtance of 12/8 (still a bit unsure) but found this article that shows this scenario was already being fearwd by MSM prior to November: https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/dec.-8-safe-harbor-deadline-is-a-critical-date-in-nightmare-election-scenarios
I keep seeing this idea that the constitution calls for contested national elections to go to the house, where each rep has to vote on party lines. That, sadly, is BULLSHIT. The constitution only calls for that in cases where there is a TIE in the electoral college. The SCOTUS can't just make up new rules...or at least, if we truly have Constitutional justices now, they won't.
Don't believe me? Try reading the fucking constitution instead of a viral Twitter post.
I absolutely think we have this, I just want everyine to know the "House votes on President" theory is horseshit unless there is an electoral tie.
I believe good ole Abe rose from the dead and corrected you.
So... you'll be deleting this embarrassment soon?
Uummm duh, NO. Because the quote Abe posted proves the point I was making, thanks Abe.
As you can clearly read above, it STILL says the electors are appointed first, and "if no such majority can be found" from those electors (the only scenario of which is a tie) THEN it goes to the House.
But please, by all means, educate me on the section that says we can skip the appointment of electors and negate the whole election if SCOTUS says so?
If a state or two - or six - can't get their act together by December 14th, there is a grace period to January 6 for states to get their electors to vote. If by January 6th they still can't get their electors together for whatever reason, then those states are simply removed from the overall total.
But the Supreme court cannot swoop in and say "oh, these six states have voter fraud issues, therefore the whole election for the other 44 states is called off and we are sending this thing to the House." That's not how it works.