8972
posted ago by oxygen ago by oxygen +8972 / -0

Senator Doug Mastriano is attempting today to get enough support to pass a resolution that would enable Pennsylvania to exercise their constitutional authority to seat the electors themselves and decide which electors to send to DC to vote for president. But enough of his colleagues need to support it in order for it to pass.

CALL THEM AND EMAIL!!! (PREFERABLY CALL). LET THEM KNOW HOW YOU FEEL. DEMAND THEY DO THIS. IF THEY DON'T, DEMAND TO KNOW WHY.

IF THEIR VOICEMAIL IS FULL, EMAIL THEM, AND THEN CALL BACK LATER.

PA senate:

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/home/member_information/contact.cfm?body=S

PA House of Representatives:

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/home/member_information/contact.cfm?body=H

Not sure who your PA state senator or representatives are? Click here

Doug Mastriano was on War Room this morning in case you missed it. The PA senate leadership was dragging their feet and Doug said we needed to contact the legislature:

https://youtu.be/hXQ4kDgjDiU?t=5786 (timestamp 1:36:20)

And remember: Even if the resolution is introduced and passes, enough republicans in both houses are going to have to flip to supporting Trump electors, not Biden. Remember how weak-kneed they are!

If you live outside Pennsylvania, you can still contact the Senate and House leadership:

Senate Pro Tem (republican): Jake Corman / (717) 787-1377 / (814) 355-0477 /

Senate Majority Leader (republican): Kim L. Ward / (717) 787-6063 / (724) 600-7002 /

Speaker of the House of Reps (republican): Bryan Cutler / (717) 284-1965 / (717) 783-6424 /

Majority leader of House of Reps (republican): Kerry A. Benninghoff / +1 (814) 355-1300 / (717) 783-1918 /

Comments (282)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
12
sybo 12 points ago +12 / -0

I think they want to keep most of the evidence close to the chest, not reveal too much in the lower courts, because they dont want to litigate in a lower court that might drag its feet on everything, so they file a small claim, and the court says fuck off, its an overall strategy to get the SCOTUS asap.

3
eatenbyagrue 3 points ago +3 / -0

The SC is not where you present new evidence. That is simply not how legal procedure works. You merely argue the lower court erred in some way. And if you have fuck all for evidence in the lower court (and didn't even bother to plead fraud), the SC isn't going to help you.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0