Fraud is not the issue they are arguing. All they need to prove, either through incompetence or neglect (maybe fraud), is that legal voting procedure was not followed. That's it. We all know that's what happened, and the SCOTUS must decide with the Trump team.
So they didn't plead fraud. They were arguing invalid votes counted. That doesn't require fraud, it only requires invalid ballots counted - RG provided proof of that.
This would be like I fired a gun into the air, The bullet came down to hit you, injuring you. You sued me for medical bills and damages due to negligence. The judge demands proof of intent to kill - essentially that your lawyers prove attempted murder instead of negligence. The judge throws out the case because your lawyer admits he has no proof of intent to kill.
Invalid ballots counted does not require intent. It could be that the workers in one district just wanted to help voters by curing the ballots - adding dates or signatures when the voter had failed to provide those on the form. It could be they just contacted voters to come in and correct their ballots - come in to sign it, write the date on there. But in the next district, workers followed the letter of the law - they didn't cure ballots or contact voters to correct their own ballots. That would invalidate the cured ballots, and it would violate equal treatment. Absent the ability to prove every ballot in the "curing" districts wasn't cured, all the ballots there are invalid because there is proof the election workers didn't follow the law.
RG provided both - proof of altered ballots and proof of unequal treatment. There were affidavits from people. Ruling the case has no merit due to lack of evidence in the face of evidence is ridiculous.
There is clear fraud in 5-6 Democrat counties across the swing states. Complete mathematical abnormalities and impossibilities there. 200-300% turnout. Why won't they let us look at the signatures or do a proper audit?
Fraud is not the issue they are arguing. All they need to prove, either through incompetence or neglect (maybe fraud), is that legal voting procedure was not followed. That's it. We all know that's what happened, and the SCOTUS must decide with the Trump team.
SCOTUS will take the case anyway
yeah it is
Of course that was going to happen! Now off to the Supreme Court!!
Not true!
because fraud is different from unlawful votes
RENT FREE shill
Note the judges didn't look at the proof provided.
So they didn't plead fraud. They were arguing invalid votes counted. That doesn't require fraud, it only requires invalid ballots counted - RG provided proof of that.
This would be like I fired a gun into the air, The bullet came down to hit you, injuring you. You sued me for medical bills and damages due to negligence. The judge demands proof of intent to kill - essentially that your lawyers prove attempted murder instead of negligence. The judge throws out the case because your lawyer admits he has no proof of intent to kill.
Invalid ballots counted does not require intent. It could be that the workers in one district just wanted to help voters by curing the ballots - adding dates or signatures when the voter had failed to provide those on the form. It could be they just contacted voters to come in and correct their ballots - come in to sign it, write the date on there. But in the next district, workers followed the letter of the law - they didn't cure ballots or contact voters to correct their own ballots. That would invalidate the cured ballots, and it would violate equal treatment. Absent the ability to prove every ballot in the "curing" districts wasn't cured, all the ballots there are invalid because there is proof the election workers didn't follow the law.
RG provided both - proof of altered ballots and proof of unequal treatment. There were affidavits from people. Ruling the case has no merit due to lack of evidence in the face of evidence is ridiculous.
WTF? Why would Rudy not plead fraud?
LOOOOOOOOOLLL
There is clear fraud in 5-6 Democrat counties across the swing states. Complete mathematical abnormalities and impossibilities there. 200-300% turnout. Why won't they let us look at the signatures or do a proper audit?
Doesn't matter. We are turning PA with Trump electors. Get bent faggot...