414
Comments (27)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
6
TheCanadian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes agreed, this is planned so they get to SCOTUS, now they will show a much different story to SCOTUS. You guys will win many have faith over here in Canada. We believe trump is still playing media and the left, he is way smarter 10D chess baby lol

3
civil_war_2021 3 points ago +4 / -1

They can’t show a different story to the Supreme Court. In appeals, you can only present the facts from the original case. You cannot introduce new evidence.

1
airgag 1 point ago +1 / -0

The original evidence is enough though, impartial court would never reject the case claiming no enough evidence.

1
civil_war_2021 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, but that has nothing to do with I was saying. The guy said they would present a different story and I said they can’t.

1
shadows_of_the_mind [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where can you introduce new evidence? To SCOTUS? Because so far none of the courts have ruled in our favor with the existing evidence. We need to be able to introduce even more to make it a guarantee for the courts to side with us. Idk how it works, though

1
civil_war_2021 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you introduce new evidence that fundamentally changes your argument, you would need to file a new case and have the lower courts make a decision with this new evidence taken into account.

Remember: you’re appealing that the lower courts did not make the right decision given the facts available at the time. You can’t go to the Supreme Court with new evidence because they will say: “the lower courts did not have this evidence to consider, so maybe they would have ruled differently with this new info”. Then they’ll send the case back down.

1
shadows_of_the_mind [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

so then how does Trump plan to have SCOTUS rule differently? Does the legal team really have the confidence that every lower court made the same mistake and SCOTUS will change that?