Completely correct. The mail in vote allowed more people to come out on both sides, the problem is really in select counties in these states (largely cities). There was clear fraud, but an increase in statewide votes is not going to show it.
I absolutely disagree. Growth is one thing in an election, but that amount of growth for a candidate that is LITERALLY the Average Joe, is unreal. States that didn’t like Clinton (which would’ve been Obama’s third term) went for Trump, Trump promised then their jobs back, which he delivered. So...why, now, would they want the third term of Obama?
The overall votes increased a lot because of mail-in voting. So saying that Biden got more votes (while still underperforming Hillary percentage wise) is not a proof of fraud.
This was to show, that the numbers increased an unrealistic level, for someone who is SO low energy. I felt there was more drive for Hillary than Biden.
The overall votes increased a lot because of mail-in voting. So saying that Biden got more votes (while still underperforming Hillary percentage wise) is not a proof of fraud.
I don't know why this is stickied. If you look at the Republican vote totals, you can see massive increases for Trump as well.
+400k in Michigan for example.
I'm not a doomer. There was fraud. This election was unconstitutional. But this is the worst "proof of fraud" I've seen so far.
Completely correct. The mail in vote allowed more people to come out on both sides, the problem is really in select counties in these states (largely cities). There was clear fraud, but an increase in statewide votes is not going to show it.
I absolutely disagree. Growth is one thing in an election, but that amount of growth for a candidate that is LITERALLY the Average Joe, is unreal. States that didn’t like Clinton (which would’ve been Obama’s third term) went for Trump, Trump promised then their jobs back, which he delivered. So...why, now, would they want the third term of Obama?
The overall votes increased a lot because of mail-in voting. So saying that Biden got more votes (while still underperforming Hillary percentage wise) is not a proof of fraud.
I'm gonna have to agree, grudgingly.
In Florida the chart shows Trump getting +1,000,000 over the baseline but that doesn't make him a cheater.
Yet for Minnesota something is definitely wrong there.
This was to show, that the numbers increased an unrealistic level, for someone who is SO low energy. I felt there was more drive for Hillary than Biden.
The overall votes increased a lot because of mail-in voting. So saying that Biden got more votes (while still underperforming Hillary percentage wise) is not a proof of fraud.
The charts here show higher Biden %ages as well, do they not?
That's not a proof of fraud though.