I absolutely disagree. Growth is one thing in an election, but that amount of growth for a candidate that is LITERALLY the Average Joe, is unreal. States that didn’t like Clinton (which would’ve been Obama’s third term) went for Trump, Trump promised then their jobs back, which he delivered. So...why, now, would they want the third term of Obama?
The overall votes increased a lot because of mail-in voting. So saying that Biden got more votes (while still underperforming Hillary percentage wise) is not a proof of fraud.
I absolutely disagree. Growth is one thing in an election, but that amount of growth for a candidate that is LITERALLY the Average Joe, is unreal. States that didn’t like Clinton (which would’ve been Obama’s third term) went for Trump, Trump promised then their jobs back, which he delivered. So...why, now, would they want the third term of Obama?
The overall votes increased a lot because of mail-in voting. So saying that Biden got more votes (while still underperforming Hillary percentage wise) is not a proof of fraud.
I'm gonna have to agree, grudgingly.
In Florida the chart shows Trump getting +1,000,000 over the baseline but that doesn't make him a cheater.
Yet for Minnesota something is definitely wrong there.