Trump made historic gains among Hispanics, especially among Cubans in Florida. Are Hispanics disputing this? No - because they actually cast those votes. Are democrats disputing this? No - because they don't want anyone looking closely at the election. In fact, many democrats have not been shy about dumping the "traitorous" Hispanic demo.
Meanwhile, Trump lost support among exactly one demo: white males. Are white males disputing this? Yes - because they didn't cast those votes. Are democrats disputing this? Depends when you ask them, I suppose. Before the election, literally no one was predicting that Trump's most reliable demo would abandon him for a political party that actively hates them. Democrats were running non-stop anti-white agitprop, which should have driven white men even further towards Trump.
Instead, we have a demographic shift that makes no sense, and no one on the left has even tried to explain how it happened.
"I mean before the election, literally no one was predicting that Trump's most reliable demo would abandon him for a political party that actively hates them."
Exactly this. I'd like this forum to make this point more often.
So many aspects to this election that are completely inexplicable from a sociological / political perspective, and which no one predicted ... inexplicable if you don't account for massive fraud.
Meanwhile, Trump lost support among exactly one demo: white males. Are white males disputing this? Yes - because they didn't cast those votes.
One thing to remember is that info about race isn’t tabulated from voter data itself or anything — it’s only collected via exit polling. So I’m not quite sure what you mean by white males disputing this (because, by definition, they’re the ones who originally reported it).
Of course, we could question whether the exit polling is correct here — though I think the two major exit polls both suggested a drop in white male support.
(Here’s a detailed report on one of these exit polls.)
Are white males disputing this? Yes - because they didn't cast those votes.
I've been wondering if the Dems targeted specific demographics when they created fake votes, so as to set up future narratives about how this or that group is abandoning the Republicans.
This time I suspect that they needed so many votes that they just used every dead and moved-away person they could find, but it wouldn't surprise me if they add another element to their cheating in the future.
Trump made historic gains among Hispanics, especially among Cubans in Florida. Are Hispanics disputing this? No - because they actually cast those votes. Are democrats disputing this? No - because they don't want anyone looking closely at the election. In fact, many democrats have not been shy about dumping the "traitorous" Hispanic demo.
Meanwhile, Trump lost support among exactly one demo: white males. Are white males disputing this? Yes - because they didn't cast those votes. Are democrats disputing this? Depends when you ask them, I suppose. Before the election, literally no one was predicting that Trump's most reliable demo would abandon him for a political party that actively hates them. Democrats were running non-stop anti-white agitprop, which should have driven white men even further towards Trump.
Instead, we have a demographic shift that makes no sense, and no one on the left has even tried to explain how it happened.
Because it didn't. And they know it.
"I mean before the election, literally no one was predicting that Trump's most reliable demo would abandon him for a political party that actively hates them."
Exactly this. I'd like this forum to make this point more often.
So many aspects to this election that are completely inexplicable from a sociological / political perspective, and which no one predicted ... inexplicable if you don't account for massive fraud.
One thing to remember is that info about race isn’t tabulated from voter data itself or anything — it’s only collected via exit polling. So I’m not quite sure what you mean by white males disputing this (because, by definition, they’re the ones who originally reported it).
Of course, we could question whether the exit polling is correct here — though I think the two major exit polls both suggested a drop in white male support.
(Here’s a detailed report on one of these exit polls.)
I've been wondering if the Dems targeted specific demographics when they created fake votes, so as to set up future narratives about how this or that group is abandoning the Republicans.
This time I suspect that they needed so many votes that they just used every dead and moved-away person they could find, but it wouldn't surprise me if they add another element to their cheating in the future.
You're giving them waaaaay too much credit. They had to PANIC CHEAT to pull this out.