53
Comments (15)
sorted by:
4
Shempy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because they are leftist hacks

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
MaximusKekimus [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does this mean they aren’t able to appeal it?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
MaximusKekimus [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you 🙏

-12
Schiffblower -12 points ago +1 / -13

Get The Fuck Out Of Here Shill

5
MaximusKekimus [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

Um I’m not a shill. I’m asking a simple question. You get the fuck out

3
badfish1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Corruption at the highest levels?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
MaximusKekimus [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s not very smart of them. Do you think they intentionally brought this case forward as a sort of smoke screen for other cases they’ll bring forward?

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
heyhay83 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hate to say it but theory you worded the ruling makes sense. I don't know how you throw out all the ballots for two that technically didn't violate any requirements. If this is their argument it's pretty fucking weak.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
heyhay83 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea any reasonable questioning or thinking around here is reacted to pretty harshly. I'm sure you have been called a shill/doomer quite a bit. I know I have for other things.