Yes, Texas refused to certify Dominion 3 different years. I assume the finding you describe in the comment is one of the problems. Dominion made big claims about meeting high internet security standards for bank cards but actually failed 8/10 of those.
Actually, the first attempt was in 2012. You can search "Dominion not Certified in Texas" and you will see a couple of official documents from the State of Texas on the subject.
Bait and switch, these voting companies are literally the vote theft mechanism, of the left. The more I think on it, I think cia saw the writing on the wall, and developed it with venezuela, and perfected the operation of it in foreign elections. Then it was used here.
The government has known for years, people were walking up to discrepancies in the operation of the government, where the tax dollars were disappearing, and so forth. This feels like this has been democrats and Rino's project for at least 20+ years.
These are not far-fetched ideas, cause the truth is deffo stranger than fiction. I've never seen a novel with so much going on
Whoa. Certifying the system, but not the system you are getting. No wonder the Democrats were bragging about turning Texas blue and then all of a sudden stopped that mantra last year.
To be clear, I am posting this more as a question, rather some than huge bombshell announcement.
According to the review:
Although more appropriate for the technical examiners to address, the SERVER and other portions of the hardware and software used by the Dominion officials during the exam were not part of the equipment/programs listed in the certification application. However, it appears that these items may be necessary for a complete system that would be sold to Texas election end-users. This creates a conundrum concerning exactly what is being certified and what is being sold.
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't the server be an extremely important component of the system? What are the implications of trying to sneak through certification without the server? What would be the implication if this happened in other states and Dominion was certified regardless? How does this play out against Dominion's claims of being "certified" by relevant agencies?
These servers don’t meet the most basic security reviews, much less the stringent STIGs required for secure operations. The idea of some bureaucrat SOS understanding the true complexities of a secure communication system is total bullshit. You have to harden everything and have bulletproof auditing—none of which is evident in these systems.
Point of fact, they are explicitly designed to be insecure and allow bidirectional traffic between servers and even have back doors into the primary (official) databases. I couldn’t begin to tell you all the vulnerabilities and security holes. Ramsland has documented these problems for years, but no agency has taken action.
Yes, Texas refused to certify Dominion 3 different years. I assume the finding you describe in the comment is one of the problems. Dominion made big claims about meeting high internet security standards for bank cards but actually failed 8/10 of those.
Actually, the first attempt was in 2012. You can search "Dominion not Certified in Texas" and you will see a couple of official documents from the State of Texas on the subject.
Bait and switch, these voting companies are literally the vote theft mechanism, of the left. The more I think on it, I think cia saw the writing on the wall, and developed it with venezuela, and perfected the operation of it in foreign elections. Then it was used here.
The government has known for years, people were walking up to discrepancies in the operation of the government, where the tax dollars were disappearing, and so forth. This feels like this has been democrats and Rino's project for at least 20+ years.
These are not far-fetched ideas, cause the truth is deffo stranger than fiction. I've never seen a novel with so much going on
Whoa. Certifying the system, but not the system you are getting. No wonder the Democrats were bragging about turning Texas blue and then all of a sudden stopped that mantra last year.
To be clear, I am posting this more as a question, rather some than huge bombshell announcement.
According to the review:
Correct me if I am wrong, but wouldn't the server be an extremely important component of the system? What are the implications of trying to sneak through certification without the server? What would be the implication if this happened in other states and Dominion was certified regardless? How does this play out against Dominion's claims of being "certified" by relevant agencies?
These servers don’t meet the most basic security reviews, much less the stringent STIGs required for secure operations. The idea of some bureaucrat SOS understanding the true complexities of a secure communication system is total bullshit. You have to harden everything and have bulletproof auditing—none of which is evident in these systems.
Point of fact, they are explicitly designed to be insecure and allow bidirectional traffic between servers and even have back doors into the primary (official) databases. I couldn’t begin to tell you all the vulnerabilities and security holes. Ramsland has documented these problems for years, but no agency has taken action.