Both parties are up to their necks in fraud and have been for decades. Why do you think that the vast majority of Rs are, at best, avoiding talking about the obvious fraud like the plague? Ds and the media (BIRM) were heavily reporting the same stuff that they are censoring now for years.
Want more evidence? Do some homework on the Commission of Presidential Debates and look at the rules. It was founded by the Uniparty to control the narrative and exclude everyone else. In it's entire history, there has only been one person who was not a Democrat or Republican allowed to debate, Ross Perot.
According to what I've been reading in other places, the cheating was held to 3% because they were afraid of tipping too far and exposing the fraud. If they were going to lose by more than that, then they'd let it go.
In their desperation to get Trump out they broke that rule, pushed too hard, and no it's over the top obvious.
In the last, providing they controlled both candidates, they really don't care who wins. It's different now because they can't control Trump. 2016 was was supposed to be Bush Vs Clinton run off. But Trump spoiled their little game.
Unlikely that we've had real elections since Kennedy. Maybe even before that.
The cheating done for Obama and Joe is big league stuff that requires a lot of organizing and payoffs. Most states only recently began using the Dominion system, so they mostly had to do it the old-fashioned way--ballots in the back door. Remember the hanging-chad fiasco? People tried to punch multiple punchcards but the machine they were using could no punch them all out, so they invented new terms like "dimpled chad" which was something that could not have been made in a legit voting machine.
It also stands to reason, why didn't they create a blue wave and massively win the Senate this year, but they didn't. A comment Sydney made about they don't do this for nothing, but for the money. Thus, the cheaters don't really care who wins, only the ones who pay.
You plan on launching wars with PELOSI? Gunna need some republicans to push that part of your program. You need the Dems to go for the social issues. Takes two to ruin the country.
Because the only way you can guarantee a win is to go over the top with cheating like we saw this time. To go as far as it takes. If you just give candidates an edge, they will win "all things being equal", but that won't stop a wave election.
You don't want anyone to go "wait, these numbers are bullshit" and keep fighting until the truth comes out, because that risks exposing the whole trick. So if giving people a 1-3% edge, or 35k bonus votes, or whatever, doesn't do it, you just have to shrug and try again next time.
It's the Uniparty.
Both parties are up to their necks in fraud and have been for decades. Why do you think that the vast majority of Rs are, at best, avoiding talking about the obvious fraud like the plague? Ds and the media (BIRM) were heavily reporting the same stuff that they are censoring now for years.
Want more evidence? Do some homework on the Commission of Presidential Debates and look at the rules. It was founded by the Uniparty to control the narrative and exclude everyone else. In it's entire history, there has only been one person who was not a Democrat or Republican allowed to debate, Ross Perot.
Neocons have bought plenty of elections, it seems
According to what I've been reading in other places, the cheating was held to 3% because they were afraid of tipping too far and exposing the fraud. If they were going to lose by more than that, then they'd let it go.
In their desperation to get Trump out they broke that rule, pushed too hard, and no it's over the top obvious.
Yes it's all an illusion.
"All the world is a stage" as they say.
In the last, providing they controlled both candidates, they really don't care who wins. It's different now because they can't control Trump. 2016 was was supposed to be Bush Vs Clinton run off. But Trump spoiled their little game.
Unlikely that we've had real elections since Kennedy. Maybe even before that.
yes
bread and circuses for the masses
pay no attention
sleep.
breed.
Make more tax donkeys for your reptilian overlords
How do you spell epiphany?
Because the prize of President was crucial to the big ReSet.
The cheating done for Obama and Joe is big league stuff that requires a lot of organizing and payoffs. Most states only recently began using the Dominion system, so they mostly had to do it the old-fashioned way--ballots in the back door. Remember the hanging-chad fiasco? People tried to punch multiple punchcards but the machine they were using could no punch them all out, so they invented new terms like "dimpled chad" which was something that could not have been made in a legit voting machine.
Exactly! I want refunds! I want reparations!
It also stands to reason, why didn't they create a blue wave and massively win the Senate this year, but they didn't. A comment Sydney made about they don't do this for nothing, but for the money. Thus, the cheaters don't really care who wins, only the ones who pay.
You plan on launching wars with PELOSI? Gunna need some republicans to push that part of your program. You need the Dems to go for the social issues. Takes two to ruin the country.
Shit man, you're not supposed to take the whole bottle of red pills in one day. You're going to OD
I agree. Because Romney was so objectionable we did not notice.
Because the only way you can guarantee a win is to go over the top with cheating like we saw this time. To go as far as it takes. If you just give candidates an edge, they will win "all things being equal", but that won't stop a wave election.
You don't want anyone to go "wait, these numbers are bullshit" and keep fighting until the truth comes out, because that risks exposing the whole trick. So if giving people a 1-3% edge, or 35k bonus votes, or whatever, doesn't do it, you just have to shrug and try again next time.
Obama was not running in 2014...