7245
Comments (184)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
39
Vadernocturnus 39 points ago +39 / -0

PA shoved ACT77 down PA citizens throats to expand absentee ballots. The did not properly amend their state constitution.

Instead of the election getting tossed, PA is now moving to seat their own electors. Being pushed by GOP, we can pray they do not stab Trump in the back.

The fact they are flipping results and chunking ballots out, most likely a Trump win barring appeals and setbacks.

4
Bldg_2019 4 points ago +4 / -0

Muh global pandemic!

1
Mean_MAGA_Facka 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well said. Act 77 is a straight forward case of an unconstitutional state law and a violation of equal protection constitutionally at the federal level.

The state courts can and will pull BS just like Bush v Gore in 2000 but when it gets to SCOTUS, the BS will stop.

Yes Roberts is a double-agent, Trump-hating POS but it's highly likely IMO that SCOTUS goes 5-4 against PA Act 77 on at least one of those constitutional grounds. The next problem though is, what is the relief?

SCOTUS should invalidate all of their mail-in ballots leaving the PA state legislature the decision to either let Trump win on in-person voting or choose the electors. What concerns me is if the state legislature will pull some BS and either split the electors 50/50 for each candidate or otherwise favor Joe.