1037
posted ago by BasedNJDeplorable ago by BasedNJDeplorable +1037 / -0

This is speculation but my gut feeling is that Biden has already accepted he must concede. I think Biden has been cooperating with the White House. He knows they have evidence of his crimes that could put him in jail for life. I actually think the Trump administration and Biden will make a deal. If Biden concedes then Trump will let him retire to obscurity and never go to jail. My guess is when Biden concedes he will do it in a prerecorded video. He will say his experts statisticians have analyzed the data and it’s determined that the best course of action is too concede. The media will go nuts and the next 4 years will be very interesting.

Comments (146)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
12
Saltflake 12 points ago +13 / -1

I keep seeing interweb is rumbling with this idea lately. I also heard about watermarked ballots. Many said it was a fake. Turned out to be true. I read about Trump reinstating firing squads. Some called fake news. It also turned out to be true. All I can say is this. If Trump forces Biden to concede, I hope Biden will be the only one of the treasonous bastards that gets away with it and Trump goes after all the rest.

4
Hairy_Mouse 4 points ago +8 / -4

That whole blockchain watermark shit was a COMPLETE LARP.

4
Saltflake 4 points ago +4 / -0

I understand the part about the watermarks being radioactive etc was incorrect but there are simple watermarks on ballots. There is suspicion (sworn affidavit) that ballots have been identified with a "grey" watermark on them (Georgia, I think).

2
NeverInterruptEnemy 2 points ago +3 / -1

Some ballots being printed with a clear watermark vs a cheaper gray one is according to an affidavit.

The infowars total fucking bullshit was about a centrally printed (no) sting op (no) super special barcode (no). Fuck infowars, seriously, we don’t need tabloid shit dragging us down.

3
Saltflake 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree but if it was not intended as a way of proving valid ballots (ie.sting) then why use them at all. At one point I read that some radioactive ink was used and I agree it was debunked. I was only referring to the difference between the authentic and forged watermarks (grey) which was testified by a witness in a sworn affidavit in the GA lawsuit. Is any of that tabloid shit?