"Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77."
Ackshually, the 1.7 million figured is disputed since only 1.8 million were sent out in PA. How 2.5 million got returned is quite the trick...
PA goes to Trump.
It would be the ones that came in after the 3rd and without signatures. Still enough to flip the state to Trump.
This will all be quashed by the Pennsylvania Supreme court and head to scotus.
How do you appeal from a state court to a federal court?
Not all mail in ballots will be thrown out, just the ones that don't qualify, which is still a lot.
Is this possible?
The judge sure thinks so.
"Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77."
These terms are acceptable.