166
posted ago by HeavenlyTrumpets ago by HeavenlyTrumpets +170 / -4

I know some people will get mad about this, but I also think some who will get mad know I'm really right. Nothing good comes from normalizing and spreading this perversion. They are going for pedophilia now too, just like the people in tune knew was coming 50 years ago.

Comments (83)
sorted by:
34
NinjaPede 34 points ago +34 / -0

My problem is why does my two year old need to know your sexual preference? I really cannot comprehend that.

8
glow-operator-2-0 8 points ago +8 / -0

Your 20 needs to find out (or be aware) but not your two year old

0
Fordheartskav 0 points ago +3 / -3

Because they’re pedos. Sick freaks for pushing that shot on children

19
Akfiredragon1 19 points ago +22 / -3

The whole point of pushing the faggot agenda is to destroy western civilization.

-1
Methodmapper -1 points ago +2 / -3

I know, trust and adore many gay people. Not because they are gay, but because they are really great people. They are God's creation. I appreciate the OP not using slurs to make his point. I do wish it was clearer that we don't disagree with them as God's creation, we disagree with the Gay agenda being forcefed to us and our children. Did our attitude toward them need adjusting? yes! Do I need gay sex scenes in my entertainment with a sexy lead, hell no. The line of acceptable manipulation was way the f back there!

CRT and divisive identity politics are hijacking a serious natural part of our race. They are using the disgust that is natural for humans to feel for things that are different and blowing it up into a divisive agenda. The best thing we can do is disarm it with love for the individual people. I can love them but disagree with them and not allow them to press their society-breaking agenda into my head with propaganda.

I'm all for helicopter rides for communists and pedophiles. These are agendas that scar and destroy lives. But there is room in my heart to use love to win hearts and minds by separating the people I know from the ideas that will destroy our nation.

Forcing me to watch something that I find disgusting, to change my mind, and then trying to shame me if I look away by claiming I'm afraid of it, is called groming. It's manipulative and wrong. Shame on them for infecting our society with it.

Check out this interesting conversation about disgust: https://youtu.be/sPho0bpoKm8

0
VetforTrump2 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm kind to all. But I'm not a cheer leader. Live your life, keep private stuff private live in harmony.

14
Raritat 14 points ago +15 / -1

We need to ask our gay MAGA pedes for their opinion.

5
FreedomFromGovt 5 points ago +10 / -5

If they have an opinion, they most assuredly and emphatically will state it. If the last 30 years of strident LGBT activism has shown us anything, it's that they are willing to go as far as leftwing radicalism demands. So, probably redundant to "ask them" at this point.

14
JKillen 14 points ago +14 / -0

Most of them just aren't down with the rianbow cult..

Just like straight people might talk dirty and share lockeroom talk in private, but we and don't blare it all over the world wherever we go.

They're just people.

Theres something wrong with wanting to advertise the most intimate details of your life and body and what you do with it.

Even Rick Grenell of which im a yuge fan, listen to him speak and he's just a based dude. Never once mentions or pulls some type of card.

17
Bundleshee 17 points ago +17 / -0

I'm bi and I cant fucking stand the rainbow cult.

8
JKillen 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm in Orlando. You've got no idea...

The Pride parades you've got people taking kids to...ugh

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
Bundleshee 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's one thing that always gets me.

If you're an adult and like the same sex, have at it

If you want to tattoo a giant rainbow on your ass, sure you're an adult, that's you're decision.

But when shit is forced on kids I have a massive issue. Kids cant consent nor should they have sexuality pushed onto them.

6
the_golden_path 6 points ago +6 / -0

your sex life should be private, so I'm against the parades and the flashy bullshit

i'm for equality and awarding merits (not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country).

as far as marriage - up to the church (freedom of religion), but the state should provide equal benefits to people and I think that was the main argument with gay marriage in the first place.

I agree that there's issues with many elements of the gay culture that's out of control and it should be discussed and balanced out. the LBGTQ makes it hard to reach a compromise though since whoever is leading them seem to be absolute morons.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
Archmagnus 3 points ago +3 / -0

I want to consensually fuck both men and women in the privacy of my bedroom in whatever legal way I can without endangering anyone's health or well-being.

I don't really mind gay characters in fiction if that is part of their character, not some woke attempt at tokenism and filling up quotas, so the rainbow haired weirdos can pat themselves on the back later.

Gay pride parades are a disgrace to humanity, and need to go.

LGBT activist achieved most of their goals of equality and acceptance years ago, their constant pushing for more and more does more harm than good.

Any more questions?

0
Fordheartskav 0 points ago +2 / -2

I’m straight and I don’t like blatant straight sexuality shoved in my face either. Degeneracy comes in all shapes and sizes

12
jtt888 12 points ago +13 / -1

More than anything, it's just become obnoxious. If you want to be a fag, go ahead. That's between you and your god. But enough with the t-shirts and flags once a year, the gays in 70% of the commercials, forcing institutions to applaud your bedroom antics, getting the government to coerce people.

Just go fuck people in private like normal people and stop acting like 3% (at best) of the population needs 70% of the attention.

12
kogar 12 points ago +12 / -0

Conservative LGBs agree with this. The whole "pride pandering" thing is just marketing designed to sell shit.

-4
MartinLuther2 -4 points ago +3 / -7

You still dont get it do you? Dumb as a rock

0
jtt888 0 points ago +1 / -1

You've got to be one of the most downvoted people on this message board.

10
bellcurvestrikesback 10 points ago +13 / -3

Agreed. Toleration=/=Promotion

8
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 8 points ago +10 / -2

Exactly. Tolerate is just about the opposite of "celebrate." Yet with their typical doublespeak, they convince people otherwise.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
8
Supermatmike 8 points ago +8 / -0

What's that you're gay?

I don't fucking care, keep it to yourself.

6
kogar 6 points ago +10 / -4

Piss off. I know a LOT of non-straight conservatives(many in law enforcement). They AGREE with you that trannies and gender-confused people are mental cases, and they would just as quickly disembowel a pedophile. Nor do they believe that homosexuality needs to take some kind of front-and-center status in sex education at all (but at the same time. LGB kids should not be made to feel like second-class citizens)

But your kind of hate makes it impossible to have that discussion. They simply bow out and don’t show up at the table. Leaving a table full of people like you and the mass of progressive globalists. Each side viewing the world in moral absolutes.

Claiming something as old as mankind has existed a "perversion" is just refusing to understand the truth, that a very small percentage of people have ZERO desire to be physically involved with a person of the opposite sex. By no means does that give anybody the right to tell them they are less "human" than you are.

So back the fuck off with your use of "they." Don’t let "the tyranny of the ‘or’" control your thinking.

2
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 2 points ago +8 / -6

Murder and rape are as old as mankind too. That's not a measure of something being okay.

Homosexuality is a clear perversion, as demonstrated by logical deduction. Natural, generative human design is clearly for male and female to be together. Homosexuality is literally degenerate and destructive. This is true even without bringing God into it by the way. The truth of it is emphasized for people who know that order and logic are God's ways. It isn't necessary for a person to believe in God though, to logically deduce that homosexuality is by definition a perversion and serves no good purpose.

P.S. I never said anyone is "less human." Your indoctrination is speaking, not your critical thinking.

3
kogar 3 points ago +4 / -1

"Murder and rape are as old as mankind too. That's not a measure of something being okay."

Nice red herring.

0
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yet you respond to nothing I said. It's not a "red herring." I was pointing out that something existing since people have existed isn't a legitimate argument in its favor.

1
kogar 1 point ago +2 / -1

Your moral equivalency of murder and homosexuality is disturbing. I'm done with this conversation. I've said my piece.

-4
ltbadpuppy -4 points ago +4 / -8

Logical deduction?? You realize that in nature there are animals that can be gay. So scientifically, having a certain percentage of homosexuality is natural. Look up gay penguins for a nice example. Also look up logic please.

0
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 0 points ago +5 / -5

Yes I realize there are animals that sodomize each other. There are also animals that eat their young and throw feces at one another. This is another logical fallacy thrown around ad nauseum by people who refuse to see what is obviously true. The behavior of animals is not a barometer or indicator for moral human behavior.

6
deleted 6 points ago +9 / -3
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
cognizant_retard 5 points ago +10 / -5

Whole heartedly agree, they shouldn't encourage the mental illness. I get they're are still going to be around and no real way to really help them, other than allow them to destroy themselves. You really can't help those who don't think they need to be helped, and become comfortable with their condition. I dont think the people suffering from that condition should be hated or anything. But for it to encouraged and thrown in the faces of everyone who watches television, is absurd. Trying to normalize their perversion, its an attempt at further eroding our society.

6
deleted 6 points ago +9 / -3
2
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 2 points ago +7 / -5

I totally agree. Refusing to promote the behavior isn't "hating" someone.

1
cognizant_retard 1 point ago +3 / -2

Wasn't implying that it was

4
dissin_nips 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they were making a general statement about how the left thinks that you must either endorse and buy into the LGBT stuff wholesale, or you are considered to be hateful, which has always been a ridiculous premise. I can disagree with somebody's lifestyle or choices without hating them, and it's Christianity 101 to love the sinner but hate the sin, just as Jesus does.

0
cognizant_retard 0 points ago +1 / -1

My mistake, I thought perhaps I wasn't making myself as clear as I had liked to. It is true thats usually how the world views disapproval of those actions. The either you accept us, otherwise you hate us mindset is bizarre.

4
meriwetherlewis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Except for Rick Grinnell. He can do whatever the hell he wants.

4
SmokeCrack 4 points ago +8 / -4

Only a crusade will fix this

4
IBeenAroundSince2016 4 points ago +8 / -4

It's evil behavior, one of the most concentrated forms of it.

4
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 4 points ago +8 / -4

Without the propaganda, the natural response is revulsion.

Even with the propaganda, most people are revolted. They're just afraid to show it.

2
FaustyArchaeus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I dont agree. My friend is gay. He is just a normal dude who tried women. Even got married and had 2 wonderful kids. But problem is he likes men and always has. You would never know he was gay as he is just a normal person

The issue is when they act gay which is a fucking total act. And Mardi gras which is perversion.

If you just became a part of society and did not have to say you were gay every second. It is worse than hanging with vegans

I do believe they cant help how they feel. I do believe it is different to Trans people which is a more of a mental condition and should not be treated as normal but they should be helped and not fed hormones

2
beenlurkingtoolong16 2 points ago +3 / -1

My problem begins when they’re shoving it down your throat with advertising. I can barely watch Hulu without Eharmony, Instagram, or MAC commercials putting it out front and center and I’m the one paying them to do it! Why are you showing me this BS when I’m watching Cartoons???

0
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

So true. Judging by some of the triggered comments here, you'd think I'd suggested no depiction should ever be allowed anywhere. I am basically saying... stop promoting it and shoving it in peoples' faces. This is less than 2% of the population. Relatively speaking, they should barely register as a representation in media. Yet, it's getting to the point where it's everywhere. That is propaganda.

2
booga 2 points ago +3 / -1

Eh, I don't understand how a guy could want to bang another dude, but I don't see it as immoral. I don't see why we have to teach it, that's stupid, but I don't view it as a sin or anything bad. People can't choose who they like. Obviously pedophiles are different and that should never be normalized, but gay stuff is whatever.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
2
manwithasham 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly. I couldn't care less.

It only bothers me when it feels forced because that's cringe as fuck.

Two men or two women kissing won't affect my day. I have more important things to care about than two dudes boning, and my sexual orientation remains the same.

1
VetforTrump2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Do it in private or ill voice my non acceptance of the perversion. Otherwise live free and let me be

1
becky21k 1 point ago +3 / -2

I think they're a necessary element of society, for those unable to make it in the reproduction game for whatever reason. The man who is unattractive and broke can appeal to other men and they can have some form of companionship and relieve their sexual needs without harm to others.

There probably should be legitimate studies done as to what drives people to be gay, as most claim they didn't chose to be. I'm sure child sexual abuse will be an element there. Perhaps emotional abuse too.

The problem is more people who base their entire identity around it and wave it like a flag for attention. That shouldn't be a thing. If you're gay you're gay, whatever, can you perform the job? Then do it.

2
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 2 points ago +5 / -3

Sexual abuse of children is absolutely a huge factor in whether a person "becomes" gay. Not saying it's the only factor, but after knowing many of them and in previous years being involved in their "causes" (while I was still blind)... I'd say with much certainty that sexual abuse in childhood is the largest common denominator.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +6 / -5
-1
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] -1 points ago +5 / -6

I'm not trying to divide anyone. I care about saving our nation, and seizing to pretend morality is relative and has no absolutes is a big part of that.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
-2
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

Work on your comprehension skills. You should be embarrassed if you don't understand that sentence.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
ltbadpuppy 0 points ago +5 / -5

There was people that said the same thing about interracial relationships too. Love is love, but I dont want to see it on display. If your only characteristic is your sex preference, than you're pathetic.

2
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 2 points ago +7 / -5

Race is not comparable. It was a successful use of leftist propaganda that got people spouting that illogical comparison.

-2
ltbadpuppy -2 points ago +2 / -4

If it wasnt comparable than you wouldn't be using the exact verbage of those who rallied against interracial marriages. Also dear god stop using logic and illogical because you're using the words fucking wrong.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
ltbadpuppy 0 points ago +2 / -2

No it doesn't, but that didnt stop people from claiming it does. A simple google search can bring up examples if you want to see.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
ltbadpuppy 1 point ago +2 / -1

Here is a link which explains how a major church did exactly what you claim they didnt.

https://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/Op-Ed/2019/03/10/God-once-opposed-interracial-marriage-too/stories/201903070010

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
0
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 0 points ago +4 / -4

what "verbiage"? Pointing out that human bodies are clearly made to go together as male and female?

I guess if you say my logic is wrong, it is automatically so. /s

-2
ltbadpuppy -2 points ago +2 / -4

Verbiage is how you express yourself, so I'm telling you that you're expressing yourself against gays the exact way people expressed themselves against interracial relationships.

I'm also not saying your logic is wrong, I'm saying there is distinct lack of it. Logic requires reasoning, cross crossing between your random opinion and church's opinion isnt anything close to logic. Saying Male and female go together because that's how babies are made is the closest you get because you're trying to allude to a nature argument, aka its natural which i already refuted. Unfortunately you're too deluded in your irrationality that you're not thinking logically.

0
Flptplt 0 points ago +3 / -3

The government should not recognize same-sex marriages. If people want to get married in some sort of church that recognizes same-sex couples, that is fine. The US government absolutely should not give tax benefits or official recognition to same-sex couples.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
0
HoLeeFuk 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why are you thinking about how other people like to fuck?

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 0 points ago +2 / -2

Give me a break...

I guess it's possible that every liberal YOU know is liberal because of "gay friends'... but if that's true, you're quite the anomaly.

Not that I expect you to believe me, but I spent a good deal of time supporting the alphabet people and their causes, and in years past, was close friends with many. This is how I came to discover the undeniable link between childhood sexual abuse and whether a person "discovers" that they are "gay." That's the horrible secret that no one wants to talk about (unless they're drunk or high and start divulging to you, which was something I experienced frequently in those years.... listening to such people I mean).

I do not "hate" anyone for being gay, and I NEVER have. However, I'm not going to just pretend it's something that makes any sense whatsoever or is morally acceptable.

Again, if you think that there is any real "struggle" for conservative causes due to "hate" of the alphabet people, I'm afraid I'd say you're out of touch. You believe the nonsense that everyone who objects to that agenda is like the Westboro Baptist Church people. You believe that because it's what media, over many years, told you to believe.

Now I tell you the truth: Any person who isn't subjected to years of propaganda and indoctrination, is intrinsically and naturally revolted by the depiction of homosexual acts. Even most people who pretend not to be, actually are. People who think what I think, that this nonsense has gone WAAAY too far and is completely out of hand, and is obvious in your face propaganda... we are the majority. Most people won't say so unless someone else says so first, because they are afraid of being ridiculously judged as you judge me, for the crime of having some shred of common sense.

-1
Fordheartskav -1 points ago +2 / -3

All explicit sexuality should ve banned from media. Making a world full of ed coomers and sterile women

-1
Aussiepede69 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Games. You forgot add games.

-1
Burritoqueen -1 points ago +2 / -3

Too bad it's not considered obscene under current law and court case precedent. The only ways I can see being able to actually ban sexual propaganda here is to amend our obscenity laws or to amend the Constitution to state that non-heteronormative sexual propaganda isn't protected speech.

Declaring such sexual propaganda to be "indecent" might work under our current laws.

0
HeavenlyTrumpets [S] 0 points ago +3 / -3

It always was though, until very recently, relatively speaking. I am certain some smart legal folks could find a way to do this.

-1
CLaRGe -1 points ago +4 / -5

Ditto for normalizing interracial relationships as well. Both rose in acceptance in parallel.