The party in both cases serve as nobillity class with near absolute power with the party leader as totalitarian ruler. All they miss to become fully feudalist is a dynasty and an intergenerational transfer of power.
See how fluid the transition worked for cuba/north korea and even modern china with their red princes and Xi. You could argue that modern china is the closest to national socialism.
Both systems are basically a rebranding of monarchy with different economic systems grafted onto it.
National Socialism had a novel currency system while commies got a retarded 100% tax rate in effect by collectivising the means of production.
Most leftist forget that every form of socialsm and communism include mandatory labor for every citizen.
Yeah, my understanding is that the English/American conception of Left/Right came from a series of debates between Thomas Payne and Edmund Burke on the nature of social change vs preserving traditions. The classical European distinction was more about the amount of power belonging to the State. The Liberals (Left) wanted limited government and individual freedom while the Monarchists (Right) believed in a powerful government ruling and dictating for the greater good.
The Nazis and Fascists considered themselves right-wing because they were totalitarian (biggest of big government). By the same standard, today's "progressive" Left would be extremely far Right while Republicans would be very much to the Left. Obviously this is not compatible with the American Left/Right concept - that's before getting into how flexible and meaningless the terms have become of late. For today's Left to simply label fascism "Right wing" is very misleading without explaining (or knowing) what that meant at the place and time it was being applied.
Perhaps the best way to understand the conflict between Fascism and Communism is to recognize that it's Sectarian. It's just like the centuries of persecution, hatred, killing, etc. between Catholic and Protestant Christians or Shia and Sunni Muslims. Fascism, National Socialism, Bolshevism, etc. are all fairly minor variations on the same foundational belief system (Socialism in this case), and those differences are enough to view each other as heretical.
Glad there are others who completely hate this fake idea of a "political spectrum" like all of society, philosophy and ideology can just fit on a 2 plane line lmao. We really need to push against a political spectrum existing. Would solve A lot of these modern ideology problems people seem to think we have.
But yeah, American conservatism leads to minimal government. But without it we have the wild west again.
On the left...It should be inserted in between every political class...Because Fascists, communists, and socialists, all employed anarchy as a means to their end.
It is 100 percent correct. The useful idiots argue that they fought against each other in Germany so they must be opposite each other. That's like saying hyenas and lions fight so they aren't both carnivores. They fight for control over the same resources.
If Trump doesn't succeed, there will either be the 1984 globalism, this, or "no reason at all"... We don't want any of those options, Trump is our hope for defeating the covid cult NWO deep state globalist etc
Communism and fascism are both proto feudalist in nature.
Commies only impose a retarded effective 100% tax on all market activity.
The party in both cases serve as nobillity class with near absolute power with the party leader as totalitarian ruler. All they miss to become fully feudalist is a dynasty and an intergenerational transfer of power.
See how fluid the transition worked for cuba/north korea and even modern china with their red princes and Xi. You could argue that modern china is the closest to national socialism.
Both systems are basically a rebranding of monarchy with different economic systems grafted onto it.
National Socialism had a novel currency system while commies got a retarded 100% tax rate in effect by collectivising the means of production.
Most leftist forget that every form of socialsm and communism include mandatory labor for every citizen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNWAIJfzGZc A good view from Razor about Fascism and Socialism.
Yeah, my understanding is that the English/American conception of Left/Right came from a series of debates between Thomas Payne and Edmund Burke on the nature of social change vs preserving traditions. The classical European distinction was more about the amount of power belonging to the State. The Liberals (Left) wanted limited government and individual freedom while the Monarchists (Right) believed in a powerful government ruling and dictating for the greater good.
The Nazis and Fascists considered themselves right-wing because they were totalitarian (biggest of big government). By the same standard, today's "progressive" Left would be extremely far Right while Republicans would be very much to the Left. Obviously this is not compatible with the American Left/Right concept - that's before getting into how flexible and meaningless the terms have become of late. For today's Left to simply label fascism "Right wing" is very misleading without explaining (or knowing) what that meant at the place and time it was being applied.
Perhaps the best way to understand the conflict between Fascism and Communism is to recognize that it's Sectarian. It's just like the centuries of persecution, hatred, killing, etc. between Catholic and Protestant Christians or Shia and Sunni Muslims. Fascism, National Socialism, Bolshevism, etc. are all fairly minor variations on the same foundational belief system (Socialism in this case), and those differences are enough to view each other as heretical.
Glad there are others who completely hate this fake idea of a "political spectrum" like all of society, philosophy and ideology can just fit on a 2 plane line lmao. We really need to push against a political spectrum existing. Would solve A lot of these modern ideology problems people seem to think we have.
Probably the first time I've seen the take of "anarchists are right-wing extremists"
Anybody who graduated before 2005 learned it in school.
I would argue anarchy sits on both ends.
But yeah, American conservatism leads to minimal government. But without it we have the wild west again.
On the left...It should be inserted in between every political class...Because Fascists, communists, and socialists, all employed anarchy as a means to their end.
^this^
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jJEuZrvNYg0
That's an awesome video. The commie that downvoted your comment is a faggot.
yeah, if right is smaller government to anarchy and the left bigger government to communism. fascism certainly lines up more with the left.
It is 100 percent correct. The useful idiots argue that they fought against each other in Germany so they must be opposite each other. That's like saying hyenas and lions fight so they aren't both carnivores. They fight for control over the same resources.
I would NEVER put my dick in a commie woman. Just sayin....
I would NEVER put my dick in a woman.
KEK!
I would never put your dick in a commie woman
*our dick
Comrade
Kek
You really are an artist with your posts. Always right where and when they need to be for the keks. ๐๐
If Trump doesn't succeed, there will either be the 1984 globalism, this, or "no reason at all"... We don't want any of those options, Trump is our hope for defeating the covid cult NWO deep state globalist etc
Not a fan of calling people ni%%ers or of raping woman but the rest sounds great..
joggers
Lol, "...in a few years"?
Try "...a few weeks." Either way...
Fake and gay. Biden has no victory.
Also...Antifa and communists use of anarchy to push into the civil war...That's why the "right" chimp'd out.
Beautiful: would read again๐ค
Welp, I know one thing, no red blooded American boy is going to be raping any leftist creatures.๐คฎ๐คฎ๐คฎ