19
Comments (8)
sorted by:
3
1984means1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

I read the Georgia filing. It's not that sloppy.

3
clemdog 3 points ago +3 / -0

it also created - interest in the LAME STREAM

2
301854 2 points ago +2 / -0

None of the errors are case ending. I think that by making a mistake on the documents, many of those on the other side who are unknown won't be able to live without calling her mistakes out, thus exposing themselves.

2
substantialmajestic 2 points ago +2 / -0

You put typos in on purpose so the media reports it.

2
Doc_Liberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah i think tit was just important to shove as much of everything into the damn thing as she could and time was against her.

Typos are the last thing they will be worried about when the case is in front of them. This is mass extinciton event of bought and paid for CCP stooges, and it will be glorious

1
KGB82 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, it was on purpose. So obvious.

2
sleepydude [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It could have been more of a happy accident. They scanned the thing, saw the typo and said "Huh, I wonder if we can use this to draw attention?"

2
KGB82 2 points ago +3 / -1

Someone said to me before that maybe they gave the court a typo free version, but released a typo-ridden version to the public. This rings true, because at their level, there is NO WAY THOSE TYPOS WERE REALLY MISSED. It's very obvious. At first I heard about it and was like, what are they even talking about. But when I saw it, I instantly knew. It's there to draw attention to it. Liberals see that and would want to dig into it finding errors. Not simply typos, understand, they're getting an immediate indication that it's done sloppily and lacks competence. They'd be all over that. There's no doubt in my mind that the typos are staged to get liberals to actually look at it. And it worked. Zero doubt. If you've ever written a paper in college you'd understand immediately. A few typos in the body, okay, maybe that could be real, but NOT two major typos in the header nearly back to back and the same word.