Pretty sure it's illegal to lie to the people in any official capacity, it's also illegal for them to impose restrictions on our rights but we have allowed it anyway. Also illegal I'm sure to experiment on people against their will.
This responsibility is entirely on us, and our complacency/apathy toward politics has been rewarded the very way our founding fathers warned us, with tyranny.
Anybody who says "I don't care about politics" is an unwitting enemy of free people, for they will be used largely to intimidate/shame those who DO care.
This is true. At least one foundingfather litigated the sht out of fake news, despite ignoring it for years. Allegations of him performing malpractiices kinda eventually pushed him to do so. His name? Benjamin Rush.
What's more, several forgotten constitutional rights actually exist within the declaration. The right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The only reason why most defer to the amendments is simply because they're concrete, as opposed to the more nebulous points found within the declaration. It doesn't make them any less important, either. And while the freedom of speech is certainly the constitution's most important provision, when it's used to disenfranchise, intimidate, and even in some circumstances, threaten an individual, it deprives them of their right to live free, pursue happiness, as well as threaten their lives as well.
One excruciatingly pathetic and, quite frankly, ill-thought out argument is that these provisions only speak as rights the government is unable to pervert. That's all well and good, except these companies are being funded by other governments. While most, I'm sure, are funnelled through other companies implicitly, there is at least one country where this doesn't quite apply to. That being that one troublesome country in Asia..... As a result of its government having a strangIehold on any businesses that come out of it, these companies by that same virtue are merely an arm of the country.
What's more is that these sociaI media companies kneel to the laws of other nations, meaning to say not only should they not be considered an American company, other laws from other countries have sway on how they operate. Therefore, they are operating on behalf of foreign governments to impose unconstitutional edict upon the American populace..... The constitution and the subsequent oaths made it very clear that their intent was to ensure America be safe from enemies both foreign and domestic.
And even if the forefaathers weren't able to predict the creation of an all encompassing network to become so widespread that it dominates much of communication, they didn't foresee the likes of electricity, easy access to clean, filtered water, and other essentials we take for granted becoming so common use, either. If a foreign adversary were to force the various institutions responsible for this to refuse their services to the American people, these institutions are, thereby, accessories.
Pretty sure it's illegal to lie to the people in any official capacity, it's also illegal for them to impose restrictions on our rights but we have allowed it anyway. Also illegal I'm sure to experiment on people against their will.
This responsibility is entirely on us, and our complacency/apathy toward politics has been rewarded the very way our founding fathers warned us, with tyranny.
Anybody who says "I don't care about politics" is an unwitting enemy of free people, for they will be used largely to intimidate/shame those who DO care.
WE allowed this evil to reign.
This is true. At least one foundingfather litigated the sht out of fake news, despite ignoring it for years. Allegations of him performing malpractiices kinda eventually pushed him to do so. His name? Benjamin Rush.
What's more, several forgotten constitutional rights actually exist within the declaration. The right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The only reason why most defer to the amendments is simply because they're concrete, as opposed to the more nebulous points found within the declaration. It doesn't make them any less important, either. And while the freedom of speech is certainly the constitution's most important provision, when it's used to disenfranchise, intimidate, and even in some circumstances, threaten an individual, it deprives them of their right to live free, pursue happiness, as well as threaten their lives as well.
One excruciatingly pathetic and, quite frankly, ill-thought out argument is that these provisions only speak as rights the government is unable to pervert. That's all well and good, except these companies are being funded by other governments. While most, I'm sure, are funnelled through other companies implicitly, there is at least one country where this doesn't quite apply to. That being that one troublesome country in Asia..... As a result of its government having a strangIehold on any businesses that come out of it, these companies by that same virtue are merely an arm of the country.
What's more is that these sociaI media companies kneel to the laws of other nations, meaning to say not only should they not be considered an American company, other laws from other countries have sway on how they operate. Therefore, they are operating on behalf of foreign governments to impose unconstitutional edict upon the American populace..... The constitution and the subsequent oaths made it very clear that their intent was to ensure America be safe from enemies both foreign and domestic.
And even if the forefaathers weren't able to predict the creation of an all encompassing network to become so widespread that it dominates much of communication, they didn't foresee the likes of electricity, easy access to clean, filtered water, and other essentials we take for granted becoming so common use, either. If a foreign adversary were to force the various institutions responsible for this to refuse their services to the American people, these institutions are, thereby, accessories.
Very well said, thank you.