Interesting point of the document is that they have to stop calling these "errors all in Biden's behalf" glitches because that would mean the machines must be re-certified. They can't have that. So then all "glitches" are memory holed in lieu of "clerical error"
Also the 781% turnout number is incorrect.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS7j8aGI/x/c/4DpL5WZ58UB
Maybe this is a different one?
https://parler.com/profile/TheElectionWizard/posts
So what are the right numbers?
That's Michigan
Yeah, this looks like an error:
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS7j8aGI/x/c/4DpL5WZ58UB
Can someone who down voted explain why? Seen this rebuttal a few times and it seems right. Down vote without rebuttal is a tantrum.
Seems like it. Too bad... Plenty of great evidence of trouble without having to lie. I'd hope we'd invite criticism at least about fact claims.
please explain the wrong, so it can be made right
Thank you! I had previously seen this stat, but no data source was provided.
Before making such an outlandish declaration(781%!), you would hope the "experts" would double-check their work.
It's likely a decimal point in the wrong place.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS7j8aGI/x/c/4DpL5WZ58UB
Here is a link to a 11/5 report claiming there were "reporting errors". "Once the correction was made, we learned Joe Biden carried Muskegon county"
Looks like they got it from James Ramsland. Harvard grad who has worked with NASA and MIT and now works for ASOG. Click the link.
So why wouldn't he double-check the most ridiculous looking number?
Interesting point of the document is that they have to stop calling these "errors all in Biden's behalf" glitches because that would mean the machines must be re-certified. They can't have that. So then all "glitches" are memory holed in lieu of "clerical error"
The title of this is wrong. It's GA not PA.