2087 Election Wizard - voter turnout in PA massive and impossible! up to 781% in one precinct. #stopthesteal (www.courtlistener.com) posted 139 days ago by Bccp 139 days ago by Bccp +2088 / -1 33 comments share 33 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (33) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 139 days ago +15 / -11 ▲ 5 ▼ – BlightBane 5 points 139 days ago +5 / -0 So what are the right numbers? permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 139 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – dark_webdev 2 points 139 days ago +2 / -0 That's Michigan permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 139 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – nasty_pelosi 3 points 139 days ago +3 / -0 Yeah, this looks like an error: https://thedonald.win/p/11QS7j8aGI/x/c/4DpL5WZ58UB permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – redmoose 3 points 139 days ago +3 / -0 Can someone who down voted explain why? Seen this rebuttal a few times and it seems right. Down vote without rebuttal is a tantrum. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – deleted 7 points 139 days ago +7 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – redmoose 3 points 139 days ago +3 / -0 Seems like it. Too bad... Plenty of great evidence of trouble without having to lie. I'd hope we'd invite criticism at least about fact claims. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 139 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – s1nt4x 2 points 139 days ago +2 / -0 please explain the wrong, so it can be made right permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – deleted 6 points 139 days ago +6 / -0 ▲ 5 ▼ – s1nt4x 5 points 139 days ago +5 / -0 Thank you! I had previously seen this stat, but no data source was provided. Before making such an outlandish declaration(781%!), you would hope the "experts" would double-check their work. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – deleted 6 points 139 days ago +6 / -0 ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 139 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – nasty_pelosi 3 points 139 days ago +3 / -0 It's likely a decimal point in the wrong place. https://thedonald.win/p/11QS7j8aGI/x/c/4DpL5WZ58UB permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 139 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 139 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – s1nt4x 2 points 139 days ago +2 / -0 Here is a link to a 11/5 report claiming there were "reporting errors". "Once the correction was made, we learned Joe Biden carried Muskegon county" permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 139 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – padfoot 1 point 139 days ago +1 / -0 Looks like they got it from James Ramsland. Harvard grad who has worked with NASA and MIT and now works for ASOG. Click the link. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – nasty_pelosi 1 point 139 days ago +1 / -0 So why wouldn't he double-check the most ridiculous looking number? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 139 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 139 days ago +1 / -0
So what are the right numbers?
That's Michigan
Yeah, this looks like an error:
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS7j8aGI/x/c/4DpL5WZ58UB
Can someone who down voted explain why? Seen this rebuttal a few times and it seems right. Down vote without rebuttal is a tantrum.
Seems like it. Too bad... Plenty of great evidence of trouble without having to lie. I'd hope we'd invite criticism at least about fact claims.
please explain the wrong, so it can be made right
Thank you! I had previously seen this stat, but no data source was provided.
Before making such an outlandish declaration(781%!), you would hope the "experts" would double-check their work.
It's likely a decimal point in the wrong place.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS7j8aGI/x/c/4DpL5WZ58UB
Here is a link to a 11/5 report claiming there were "reporting errors". "Once the correction was made, we learned Joe Biden carried Muskegon county"
Looks like they got it from James Ramsland. Harvard grad who has worked with NASA and MIT and now works for ASOG. Click the link.
So why wouldn't he double-check the most ridiculous looking number?