424
Comments (10)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
hloblart 7 points ago +7 / -0

She ruled that the already existing preliminary injunction should stand.

additionally she noted

"Additionally, Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed."

1
NOT_ADMIN 1 point ago +1 / -0

what exactly does this mean though ELI5

1
yukondave 1 point ago +1 / -0

the case is not about fraud but about the mail in ballots not being against the PA constitution. This will go to the state Supreme Court where it will be reversed. Then off to the US Supreme Court which I do not believe they will want to get involved in state matters. Even the conservative judges believe in states rights. The liberal activist judges will agree when it supports their cause.

1
BasedBetch 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s the make up of the PA Supreme Court like?