214
posted ago by rolandkhan ago by rolandkhan +215 / -1

He plays both sides. His convictions aren't really there; he claims to understand the lies and manipulations done by the mainstream, yet still bases all of his opinions/"knowledge" on what the mainstream says.

Not to mention he's constantly backtracking or saying things to make sure he stays liked by our enemies. He's so dogmatically attached to the term/label of "liberal" that he refuses to acknowledge that the only real liberals today are conservatives/Trumpers/Patriots, so he's constantly making sure to put out there that he doesn't like Trump and that he's not saying it's a good thing that Trump is going to win.

He's a sackless reader of MSM articles with no real convictions. Until he actually grows a pair, he's to be taken with a large grain of salt; just remember that anything he says is based entirely on what he knows from the MSM itself, for he still refuses to acknowledge any of the "conspiracy theories" for he follows the programming to dismiss them, even though many of them are being substantiated.

Comments (37)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
14
itsnotaboutme 14 points ago +14 / -0

I haven't clicked a pool video since Alex Jones. I am not an Alex Jones guy but Pool was pathetic in that exchange. You could play drinking games with the I'm gonna get banned for this reply stated 10-20 times in every video. Plus dude has like six stories he repeats non stop about himself.

His 15 min are up.

12
rolandkhan [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0

He would barely let Alex speak anytime he got onto something good and kept interrupting him with demands of proof even though one could easily just look the shit up. Not to mention that a lot of things he was talking about would require hours of talking if he were to have to go through and show proof point by point by point.

There's a difference between demanding evidence/proof to figure out the full objective truth, and allowing somebody to speak and get their arguments/beliefs across in a reasonable manner on the way to that truth. Just how many flows of thought did he break apart and not allow through with all of his interruptions.

Meanwhile, he'll allow other guests to talk nonsense while barely challenging a thing they say.

4
Centrist_Vet 4 points ago +4 / -0

like that pedo Vaush or however you spell that trash.