The Edison feeds on the NYTimes site aren't reporting actual vote counts for candidates. They report the total votes counted and then each candidates share as a percentage. Due to the poor precision of the percentage, it can sometimes appear like Biden gets 5,000+ new votes when really there were only 1,031 votes added. That's a loss of precision issue, not an issue of vote switching. Look carefully and you'll see the votes per candidate are simply each candidates percentage multiplied by the total votes.
While I do believe the machines did switch votes, I don't think the Edison feeds are evidence of it. I don't think the votes switching on live TV are evidence of the machines switching votes because it can be explained easily through loss of precision on the way Edison reports. If the machines switched votes (which I believe they did), there's not going to be a way for us to prove that without accessing machines.
The evidence there suggests that they finished counting absentee ballots or stopped counting ballots on election night in order to wait to see how many they would need. There's evidence there that suggests 15,466 absentee ballots were received on election day, but I believe it's possible most of those were fraudulent. I believe they waited to see how many more votes they needed and then brought in the new ballots the next day.
This information will help force the signature check to happen. Which will force them to admit they shredded the envelopes. Which is get the entire election tossed.
You certainly are an interesting user because you were mentioned by a few posts. But certainly your vocal nature is not the most honorable of our bunch. I do believe that getting this to Rudy and Sidney is why this material is being posted, though we have absolutely no idea how to accomplish this other than Sidney herself reads TD.win and reaches out to the guys in the videos. If Ted Cruz can watch TD.win then why no Rudy and Sidney? Even Trump has argued that the internet is one of the ways to get past that massive censorship. I would not denounce content like this that could boost morale of our pedes.
Added votes don't necessarily mean a hacked machine.
For example, if contrast/gamma/whatever on the scanner can be adjusted (or any other way the ballots would be unable to be determined by the computer -- extra markings, bleed through, etc?), the ballots are considered uncertain. In this case, the ballot images go into a separate directory, and an election official can then choose to manually assign them to a candidate.
The employee scanning the ballots in would be none the wiser, and it looks like they're just doing their job.
I believe Rudy discussed this in the Pennsylvania hearing, and it seems a very practical way to cheat.
Excellent analysis. Gotta love Math. Excel is cool too!
But math is RACIST REEEEEEEEEEEEE
Thank you for reposting this :) The influx of new people does justify representing the good stuff!
Even if ya cheat on a test ya gotta spread some wrong answers around the body of the test.
The Edison feeds on the NYTimes site aren't reporting actual vote counts for candidates. They report the total votes counted and then each candidates share as a percentage. Due to the poor precision of the percentage, it can sometimes appear like Biden gets 5,000+ new votes when really there were only 1,031 votes added. That's a loss of precision issue, not an issue of vote switching. Look carefully and you'll see the votes per candidate are simply each candidates percentage multiplied by the total votes.
While I do believe the machines did switch votes, I don't think the Edison feeds are evidence of it. I don't think the votes switching on live TV are evidence of the machines switching votes because it can be explained easily through loss of precision on the way Edison reports. If the machines switched votes (which I believe they did), there's not going to be a way for us to prove that without accessing machines.
I think a more important focus is to focus on the cheating in Georgia done through the absentee ballots. Read my timeline of Fulton County here: https://thedonald.win/p/11QSGyVkVo/fulton-county-timeline---impossi/
The evidence there suggests that they finished counting absentee ballots or stopped counting ballots on election night in order to wait to see how many they would need. There's evidence there that suggests 15,466 absentee ballots were received on election day, but I believe it's possible most of those were fraudulent. I believe they waited to see how many more votes they needed and then brought in the new ballots the next day.
Great...more Sidney Powell Q-tard crap.
Focus on signatures and the arguments by Rudy and Jenna!!!
This information will help force the signature check to happen. Which will force them to admit they shredded the envelopes. Which is get the entire election tossed.
Great more retard crap Go focus on polishing your CUMala Harris doll you absolute pussy
Sidney Powell is representing We the People and she's doing a hell of a lot more than YOU are!!!
You certainly are an interesting user because you were mentioned by a few posts. But certainly your vocal nature is not the most honorable of our bunch. I do believe that getting this to Rudy and Sidney is why this material is being posted, though we have absolutely no idea how to accomplish this other than Sidney herself reads TD.win and reaches out to the guys in the videos. If Ted Cruz can watch TD.win then why no Rudy and Sidney? Even Trump has argued that the internet is one of the ways to get past that massive censorship. I would not denounce content like this that could boost morale of our pedes.
Added votes don't necessarily mean a hacked machine.
For example, if contrast/gamma/whatever on the scanner can be adjusted (or any other way the ballots would be unable to be determined by the computer -- extra markings, bleed through, etc?), the ballots are considered uncertain. In this case, the ballot images go into a separate directory, and an election official can then choose to manually assign them to a candidate.
The employee scanning the ballots in would be none the wiser, and it looks like they're just doing their job.
I believe Rudy discussed this in the Pennsylvania hearing, and it seems a very practical way to cheat.
Bro, why do you have a Powell hard on??
Spamming that bs everywhere