go look at the report's "Dual Threshold" section. it explains how you could set the pixel counts to various levels, meaning you could require a bubble @ 150% for trump and a bubble of 0% for Biden. simply by switching some settings. which they list as a feature
I agree that's in there and I don't trust the software but it doesn't say it can be adjusted different for any one particular candidate, just an overall setting
But you have to acknowledge that you don't need special certification to become a vote counter. They could pick any random monkey to do it as long as it stuff the ballots into certain boxes.
go look at the report's "Dual Threshold" section. it explains how you could set the pixel counts to various levels, meaning you could require a bubble @ 150% for trump and a bubble of 0% for Biden. simply by switching some settings. which they list as a feature
That’s really telling to me. Thanks
I agree that's in there and I don't trust the software but it doesn't say it can be adjusted different for any one particular candidate, just an overall setting
But you have to acknowledge that you don't need special certification to become a vote counter. They could pick any random monkey to do it as long as it stuff the ballots into certain boxes.
Yes this is true but it is not relevant to my point
All these features each represent an unequal treatment of the vote.