We've all filled out dozens of those types of forms in our lifetimes. Not one single time have I ever used, ever been offered the option to use, or seen anyone use a marker to fill something like that out. I'm betting no one here has either.
Crazy Walmart shopper... Didn't you know that it is great to experiment & try new things. College kids are all doing it, so should the rest of the nation :p
I see that qualifier you slipped in there. Honest is a foreign concept since it is valued by While Christian Males.
To be fair, by all Judeo/Christian believing members regardless of race, language, congregation, status, etc... It also applies to many others who understand individuals are robbed of making their own decisions correctly when honesty is removed from the equation.
This has been cleared up. Pens in early voting as it gives ink time to dry. Sharpies dry fast and are needed for high volume voting. These aren't some dumb 30yr old scantron machines, these are optical scanners. Before the ballots were changed to prevent bleed-through misreads from sharpies, any wet marker like a sharpie could have bled through into a bubble on the reverse causing an over-vote. This is literally not an issue and been debunked 1000 times over. Let this misinformation die already.
No, it's because sharpies do bleed through, so if you decrease the threshold for "ambiguous marks" you get a bunch of votes on Election Day that you get to "adjudicate" in any way you wish.
There's a reason republicans dropped this lawsuit, it's specifically due to what I stated. Shit like this harms the cause and spams the site with worthless info. This email has been shared 10 times already and it's still bullshit.
So the document still says not to use it and they did anyway. Its a violation on them for not updating their documents. Just because they said it was okay doesn't mean it is when the official documentation states otherwise.
Why not use sharpies the entire time? All of the sudden the government is concerned with fiscal responsibility and sharpies cost too much? There’s zero legitimate reason to demand use of one vs the other.
A ballpoint pen dries on the paper in about 2 seconds. There is no difference between marking a ballot in the early vote and marking it on election day. It has plenty of time to dry in the identical time period before scanning. This is just ridiculous
No, ball point ben ink can smear for several minutes. It does not dry fast at all. Nobody that's done any sort of pen writing will say it won't smear for minutes. Go take your pen, bubble in a dime sized circle, give it 2 minutes and smear with finger. Oh look, it smears.
Lawsuit dropped within hours because it was a non-issue. The ONLY reason that it was potentially an issue was bleed through and bleed through alone. They made the ballots in a manner where bleed through did not screw up anything on the reverse side.
She outs herself as a traitor with the word "democracy."
I can't think of one honest reason why they would need to do this.
We've all filled out dozens of those types of forms in our lifetimes. Not one single time have I ever used, ever been offered the option to use, or seen anyone use a marker to fill something like that out. I'm betting no one here has either.
Crazy Walmart shopper... Didn't you know that it is great to experiment & try new things. College kids are all doing it, so should the rest of the nation :p
Marxists are evil to the core.
Semper Fi
This is prima facie evidence of premeditated election fraud, on a grand scale.
Semper Fi
Ya it's just one of.. hundreds? of examples so far?
The more I see this, the more I want to make a mass public hanging happen.
I see that qualifier you slipped in there. Honest is a foreign concept since it is valued by While Christian Males.
To be fair, by all Judeo/Christian believing members regardless of race, language, congregation, status, etc... It also applies to many others who understand individuals are robbed of making their own decisions correctly when honesty is removed from the equation.
Sounds like Kelly committed treason
She's on LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/in/kelly-dixon-8611361b/
Thank you. Just did the screenshot & shot some info to small local influences down there.
She deleted her Twitter account at @KellyCanHire
Really? I thought I just saw it.
Nope, it is gone. I wonder what the comments were like before she tore it down?
This has been cleared up. Pens in early voting as it gives ink time to dry. Sharpies dry fast and are needed for high volume voting. These aren't some dumb 30yr old scantron machines, these are optical scanners. Before the ballots were changed to prevent bleed-through misreads from sharpies, any wet marker like a sharpie could have bled through into a bubble on the reverse causing an over-vote. This is literally not an issue and been debunked 1000 times over. Let this misinformation die already.
No, it's because sharpies do bleed through, so if you decrease the threshold for "ambiguous marks" you get a bunch of votes on Election Day that you get to "adjudicate" in any way you wish.
Bullshit. It kicks the ballot into status on Dominion systems so that an administrator gets to decide who was voted for.
This has been demonstrated and proven.
There's a reason republicans dropped this lawsuit, it's specifically due to what I stated. Shit like this harms the cause and spams the site with worthless info. This email has been shared 10 times already and it's still bullshit.
The ballot states not to use a sharpie.
Yes, because they left that on there after modifying them for use with sharpies because they're gov and incompetent.
So the document still says not to use it and they did anyway. Its a violation on them for not updating their documents. Just because they said it was okay doesn't mean it is when the official documentation states otherwise.
Can I get the source. Happy to acknowledge I am incorrect & fix it, but I have onky seen instructions to NOT use sharpies or markers on ballots.
Why not use sharpies the entire time? All of the sudden the government is concerned with fiscal responsibility and sharpies cost too much? There’s zero legitimate reason to demand use of one vs the other.
Or a pencil
A ballpoint pen dries on the paper in about 2 seconds. There is no difference between marking a ballot in the early vote and marking it on election day. It has plenty of time to dry in the identical time period before scanning. This is just ridiculous
No, ball point ben ink can smear for several minutes. It does not dry fast at all. Nobody that's done any sort of pen writing will say it won't smear for minutes. Go take your pen, bubble in a dime sized circle, give it 2 minutes and smear with finger. Oh look, it smears.
The ballots state not to use a sharpie. So they shouldn't use a sharpie, no matter what you or they say. The ballot stated not to do so.
I want to believe you but unless you're a hipster who uses a fountain pen, ballpoint ink dries on paper in seconds.
Go fill in a bubble with a bic, it doesn't not dry instantly. https://twitter.com/MaricopaVote/status/1323728961231233025
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/07/sharpie-lawsuit-officially-dropped-plaintiffs-hours-after-biden-win-announced/6209529002/
Lawsuit dropped within hours because it was a non-issue. The ONLY reason that it was potentially an issue was bleed through and bleed through alone. They made the ballots in a manner where bleed through did not screw up anything on the reverse side.