They’ll take it up to the Supreme Court then. The doctrine of laches this court applied is sort of a “you waited too long to sue” doctrine. Not sure that really should apply for constitutional questions. The issue they are raising is that the election was conducted according to a new law that had not finished going through the amendment process, instead of the existing law on the books.
Also, going to SCOTUS isn’t guaranteed. But given the importance of the issue here, I’d imagine SCOTUS would grant cert and take the case.
Throw them into The Grand Canyon and feed the wildlife. There's a train depot there standing by ready for the thousands and thousands of fake election participants.
They’ll take it up to the Supreme Court then. The doctrine of laches this court applied is sort of a “you waited too long to sue” doctrine. Not sure that really should apply for constitutional questions. The issue they are raising is that the election was conducted according to a new law that had not finished going through the amendment process, instead of the existing law on the books.
Also, going to SCOTUS isn’t guaranteed. But given the importance of the issue here, I’d imagine SCOTUS would grant cert and take the case.
Can you explain the heli meme?
Fuck the cringe helicopters.
Fuck South American meme solutions.
Throw them into The Grand Canyon and feed the wildlife. There's a train depot there standing by ready for the thousands and thousands of fake election participants.
AMERICA not SOUTH AMERICA
All eyes on island-hopper John Roberts
Even the Justice that wrote the concurring/ dissenting opinion seems to go along with "laches is a bullshit cop out".
https://twitter.com/Elaijuh/status/1332827481951363077/photo/1