4 have to say yes, but unlike typical cases seeking Cert, the Court is aware of inevitability of these election challenges. They aren't going to delay on deciding whether or not to grant cert, so all justices will weigh in.
nigga why would 6 justices have to say no to hearing it for the court to hear it lmao? thats like asking a bitch if she tryna fuck and she say no so u think yes and try to fuck ??????
What I meant was, do they vote on not seeing a case, or do they vote on seeing a case. If the vote on not seeing it then it's 6 justices that have to say no, otherwise, it's 4 justices that have to say yes.
So will this go to the SCOTUS?
It should, there is enough evidence from what I have seen in the affidavits. Lying on signed affidavits is perjury.
Unless 6 Justices say no, yes
Do 6 justices have to say no or do 4 justices have to say yes?
4 have to say yes, but unlike typical cases seeking Cert, the Court is aware of inevitability of these election challenges. They aren't going to delay on deciding whether or not to grant cert, so all justices will weigh in.
Yes!
nigga why would 6 justices have to say no to hearing it for the court to hear it lmao? thats like asking a bitch if she tryna fuck and she say no so u think yes and try to fuck ??????
What I meant was, do they vote on not seeing a case, or do they vote on seeing a case. If the vote on not seeing it then it's 6 justices that have to say no, otherwise, it's 4 justices that have to say yes.