And the opposition is not going to trust the SC to be non-partisan, ruling on the election of the man who put three of them in there.
I can't wait till we win, but I also expect their will be chaos and blood immediately afterwards. (Which I'm okay with. I'd rather have that, than the Biden Trojan Horse administration.)
This is politics. The point is to exhaust as many viable options within the time limit and create enough doubt to then legitimate the use of Article 2. They have the authority, but the fact is the voting populace aren't a bunch of dispassionate constitutional scholars.
Huh? Scotus has always been the plan.
Obviously that's ideal...but then it goes to SCOTUS. Don't think anyone expected the lower courts to be non-partisan in their decisions.
And the opposition is not going to trust the SC to be non-partisan, ruling on the election of the man who put three of them in there.
I can't wait till we win, but I also expect their will be chaos and blood immediately afterwards. (Which I'm okay with. I'd rather have that, than the Biden Trojan Horse administration.)
I didn't say the SCOTUS would determine the outcome in a you or him type of manner.
Maybe you should phone up Trump and tell him not to bother going to the Supreme Court then, since you seem to know more than his team does?
Not a CNN fan my ass..
Oh and enough with the "Bannon knows all" type posts.
This is politics. The point is to exhaust as many viable options within the time limit and create enough doubt to then legitimate the use of Article 2. They have the authority, but the fact is the voting populace aren't a bunch of dispassionate constitutional scholars.