They'd review if the provision violated federal constitutional provisions, like the 13 Amendment. They won't review if a state law violates a state constitution.
They can on the grounds that separation of powers clause was violated in this case.
PA77's modifications that removed the safeguards were done through PA Scotus by going around the legislature. In effect, Wolf made the State's court a new legislative body. Without the House and Senate unable to do their job does violate separation of powers clause, as well equal protection and dredges up other legal issues.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I see it as a direct violation of article II Section 1 para. 2 of the federal constitution. The legislature directed the manner in which the electors would be selected, and the court did a backhanded modification.
Any modification to the election process that was not directed by the state legislature should automatically be void in a presidential election by definition as set forth in the plain language of the constitution.
They'd review if the provision violated federal constitutional provisions, like the 13 Amendment. They won't review if a state law violates a state constitution.
They can on the grounds that separation of powers clause was violated in this case.
PA77's modifications that removed the safeguards were done through PA Scotus by going around the legislature. In effect, Wolf made the State's court a new legislative body. Without the House and Senate unable to do their job does violate separation of powers clause, as well equal protection and dredges up other legal issues.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I see it as a direct violation of article II Section 1 para. 2 of the federal constitution. The legislature directed the manner in which the electors would be selected, and the court did a backhanded modification.
Any modification to the election process that was not directed by the state legislature should automatically be void in a presidential election by definition as set forth in the plain language of the constitution.
You're not wrong in that sense.