The Legislature can decide the electors at the last minute if it so chooses and can absolutely go against popular vote. One good cause would be the discovery of massive fraud, but a more likely cause would be the discovery that the winning candidate was unfit for office (such as having secretly been born outside the U.S. or only being 30 years old).
Well, technically Trump got the popular vote, since a large margin of the Biden votes were fraudulent.
They claim they don't want to rule against the will of the people, but by refusing to appoint Trump electors, they are doing EXACTLY what they claim to be against...
Edit: sorry, my first sentence comes off as too combative. It should say, “we need them to introduce the proof of fraud in court, so the legislature can act on it.” I didn’t mean to dismiss the fraud that has been proven, just meant to say it is harder to act on when it hasn’t been demonstrated in court. I’m leaving original below.
But someone has to prove fraud somewhere that isn’t a YouTube video or Twitter thread so the legislature has something to act on.
I’m so pissed at these lawyers because they aren’t even trying. Look at the PA SC dismissal today. It says there was a failure to allege any fraud, then goes on to note that is exactly what Rudy did last week.
No one is talking about fraud in the courts! Of course the act of invalidating millions of ballots is going to be an extreme remedy if they were all cast according to the process as laid out. I’d be fucking pissed if I followed the rules and my ballot was thrown out because someone else decided they didn’t like the rules.
If they would enter evidence of fraud, the solution of invalidating votes is much easier to arrive at.
Technically, it wouldn't matter if they threw a legit ballot out. If you go by the REAL results, Trump won. So, the Biden ballots don't really matter. If a Trump vote gets thrown out in the process of removing some ballots to declare Trump the winner, it still doesn't matter, because Trump wins anyways.
Without the fraudulent ballots, Trump won. Whether 1 person voted for Biden or 1 million. It would still be the same outcome.
Your vote matter in DETERMINING the winner. The winner has already been determined, and it's Trump. Now that we have established that, the ballots no longer matter. It would be like throwing out the ballots a year after the election. Once you have a winner, they no longer matter.
The Legislature can decide the electors at the last minute if it so chooses and can absolutely go against popular vote. One good cause would be the discovery of massive fraud, but a more likely cause would be the discovery that the winning candidate was unfit for office (such as having secretly been born outside the U.S. or only being 30 years old).
Well, technically Trump got the popular vote, since a large margin of the Biden votes were fraudulent.
They claim they don't want to rule against the will of the people, but by refusing to appoint Trump electors, they are doing EXACTLY what they claim to be against...
That claim has to first be proven - or, in the very least, the judge(s) must believe it.
Edit: sorry, my first sentence comes off as too combative. It should say, “we need them to introduce the proof of fraud in court, so the legislature can act on it.” I didn’t mean to dismiss the fraud that has been proven, just meant to say it is harder to act on when it hasn’t been demonstrated in court. I’m leaving original below.
But someone has to prove fraud somewhere that isn’t a YouTube video or Twitter thread so the legislature has something to act on.
I’m so pissed at these lawyers because they aren’t even trying. Look at the PA SC dismissal today. It says there was a failure to allege any fraud, then goes on to note that is exactly what Rudy did last week.
No one is talking about fraud in the courts! Of course the act of invalidating millions of ballots is going to be an extreme remedy if they were all cast according to the process as laid out. I’d be fucking pissed if I followed the rules and my ballot was thrown out because someone else decided they didn’t like the rules.
If they would enter evidence of fraud, the solution of invalidating votes is much easier to arrive at.
Technically, it wouldn't matter if they threw a legit ballot out. If you go by the REAL results, Trump won. So, the Biden ballots don't really matter. If a Trump vote gets thrown out in the process of removing some ballots to declare Trump the winner, it still doesn't matter, because Trump wins anyways.
Without the fraudulent ballots, Trump won. Whether 1 person voted for Biden or 1 million. It would still be the same outcome.
Your vote matter in DETERMINING the winner. The winner has already been determined, and it's Trump. Now that we have established that, the ballots no longer matter. It would be like throwing out the ballots a year after the election. Once you have a winner, they no longer matter.
...or born in Kenya?