That's not how it works, the PA Constitution would have to have been amended according to the processes set forth for amendment by the PA Constitution. The government CAN NOT violate it and their Supreme Court isn't a body intended to enable exceptions or circumventions of the Constitution, but to enforce it dutifully.

This decision completely ignores the obvious violation of the PA Constitution - the justices even played themselves when they complained that the suit didn't make any claims of fraud... you know why it didn't? Because it's not a requirement... the law is unconstitutional and that's all there should be to it.

The remedy need not be the total invalidation of the vote, but this court viewed that as the only logical outcome - but giving the State an opportunity to re-vote, in person, is beyond the capacity of these people.