Chief Justice Thomas noted... that the [] suit “posed troublesome questions about the constitutional validity of the new mail-in voting scheme.”
Still, they concluded: “There has been too much good-faith reliance, by the electorate, on the no-excuse mail-in voting regime … to warrant judicial consideration of the extreme and untenable remedies proposed”.
“There has been too much good-faith reliance, by the electorate, on the no-excuse mail-in voting regime"
So what he is saying here, is none of the judges have the nuts to tell the people of their state that their votes will be disregarded. They are afraid of the backlash. They are not doing their jobs which is to uphold the law. No surprise. On to an unbiased authority at the Federal level !
Chief Justice Thomas noted... that the [] suit “posed troublesome questions about the constitutional validity of the new mail-in voting scheme.” Still, they concluded: “There has been too much good-faith reliance, by the electorate, on the no-excuse mail-in voting regime … to warrant judicial consideration of the extreme and untenable remedies proposed”.
These are not judges. They’re barely men.
"yes they stole the election but it's too big to overturn"
“There has been too much good-faith reliance, by the electorate, on the no-excuse mail-in voting regime"
So what he is saying here, is none of the judges have the nuts to tell the people of their state that their votes will be disregarded. They are afraid of the backlash. They are not doing their jobs which is to uphold the law. No surprise. On to an unbiased authority at the Federal level !
Why make up negativity like that?
Can you not at least wait a few days to throw your hands up? It’s not healthy to be that negative. There’s still reason for optimism.