Of course Trump would concede if he lost fair and square. But Trump didn't lose. He won 100% lawfully, and there is no doubt about that whatsoever. So of course he will not concede. And as an aside, he might well have won the popular vote as well.
No way. They hinting military intelligence. Then that line of running the usa comes. In. Both Trump lawyers warning we have to fight our way free. Just exhaust all options first.
Likely as a result of Trump's own choosing. There were probably at least a couple of millions of highly qualified patriots in all capacities & disciplines who would feel more than honored to serve under Trump's command to save USA, but he kept appointing traitorous swamp creatures to surround himself with for some reason, unfortunately. The regrettable outcome of such action is shifting the burden of work to true patriots like Rudy & Sidney at code red while letting the appointed swamp creatures, especially at heads of FBI & DOJ, rest comfortably at codes of all colors, draining taxpayers' money while literally doing nothing if not sabotaging USA even more.
One would have thought Trump got plenty of HR experience at Trump Organization. If anything, HR vetting in public sector requires lesser skillset with less stringent qualification requirements than in private sector which can take months if not years to vet C-level executives. Trump Organization could not have thrived for almost a century had it been plagued with bad hirings.
It’s been frustrating as hell to watch the last 4 years.
Ditto. Many Trump supporters got frustrated but they were immediately banned from Trump forums like old Reddit T_D for simply raising their legit concerns. Trump's worst enemies were probably those that blindly sheltered him from realizing his own mistakes until it's too late, unfortunately.
I am not convinced there were nearly that many suitable candidates (for instance, for a position like the Secretary of Defense, you likely need certain combinations of experience and qualifications that may not be that widespread). And then there are processes like confirmation hearings and the like. Holding the House and the Senate without any RINOs or traitors would likely help matters greatly. That said, I could be wrong about it.
EDIT: Used 'secretary of defense' for the example instead.
Could you name one "bad" hire by Barry Soetoro? Has Soetoro ever mistakenly hired some Conservative patriot for any of his Cabinet positions during his 8-year reign of terror? Same question for Clinton's regime. Was jihadi Soetoro or Bill the Rapist exceptional in their hiring? Not really. The implication is hiring someone with an acceptable level of qualifications AND loyalty is not as hard as you think.
I guess he figures that it will work out before then. Terrible for morale.
Of course Trump would concede if he lost fair and square. But Trump didn't lose. He won 100% lawfully, and there is no doubt about that whatsoever. So of course he will not concede. And as an aside, he might well have won the popular vote as well.
No way. They hinting military intelligence. Then that line of running the usa comes. In. Both Trump lawyers warning we have to fight our way free. Just exhaust all options first.
Likely as a result of Trump's own choosing. There were probably at least a couple of millions of highly qualified patriots in all capacities & disciplines who would feel more than honored to serve under Trump's command to save USA, but he kept appointing traitorous swamp creatures to surround himself with for some reason, unfortunately. The regrettable outcome of such action is shifting the burden of work to true patriots like Rudy & Sidney at code red while letting the appointed swamp creatures, especially at heads of FBI & DOJ, rest comfortably at codes of all colors, draining taxpayers' money while literally doing nothing if not sabotaging USA even more.
One thing I’ll never ever understand. I love the man but he has been so bad at appointments. It’s been frustrating as hell to watch the last 4 years.
One would have thought Trump got plenty of HR experience at Trump Organization. If anything, HR vetting in public sector requires lesser skillset with less stringent qualification requirements than in private sector which can take months if not years to vet C-level executives. Trump Organization could not have thrived for almost a century had it been plagued with bad hirings.
Ditto. Many Trump supporters got frustrated but they were immediately banned from Trump forums like old Reddit T_D for simply raising their legit concerns. Trump's worst enemies were probably those that blindly sheltered him from realizing his own mistakes until it's too late, unfortunately.
I am not convinced there were nearly that many suitable candidates (for instance, for a position like the Secretary of Defense, you likely need certain combinations of experience and qualifications that may not be that widespread). And then there are processes like confirmation hearings and the like. Holding the House and the Senate without any RINOs or traitors would likely help matters greatly. That said, I could be wrong about it.
EDIT: Used 'secretary of defense' for the example instead.
Could you name one "bad" hire by Barry Soetoro? Has Soetoro ever mistakenly hired some Conservative patriot for any of his Cabinet positions during his 8-year reign of terror? Same question for Clinton's regime. Was jihadi Soetoro or Bill the Rapist exceptional in their hiring? Not really. The implication is hiring someone with an acceptable level of qualifications AND loyalty is not as hard as you think.
Oh, cool, more excuses.
His moves military are the end. No reason to let China own the presidency.