22
Comments (2)
sorted by:
1
GeekHick [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Archive -> https://archive.vn/df741

Same article on Drudge believe it or not: https://www.drudgereport.com/flash1.htm

Archived as well -> https://archive.vn/hm2cX

Had been deleted in several other places took a while to find.

1
GeekHick [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

As local election results funnel through SOE's servers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the computer servers for SOE essentially get "first look" at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA. In 2004, many Americans were justifiably concerned when, days before the presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell redirected Ohio election night results through the Tennessee-based server for several national Republican Party operations. This is worse: This redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global. A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape / photograph these poll tapes in 2008.