965 Sure, it's established precedent from 200 years ago, but it's ESTABLISHED PRECEDENT, Adam, you fuckwit (media.patriots.win) posted 140 days ago by catsfive 140 days ago by catsfive +966 / -1 14 comments share 14 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (14) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 20 ▼ – starsabove 20 points 140 days ago +20 / -0 It could be 230 years ago. If its spelled out in the US Constitution, its law. permalink save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – deleted 5 points 140 days ago +5 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 139 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – G_regulator 1 point 139 days ago +1 / -0 So by his logic the bill of rights should be struck down because it's old. What a fucking peanut. permalink parent save report block reply
It could be 230 years ago. If its spelled out in the US Constitution, its law.
So by his logic the bill of rights should be struck down because it's old. What a fucking peanut.