191
Comments (2)
sorted by:
5
nightshift [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77."

Judge McCullough adds that without the emergency injunction, the plaintiffs would likely suffer "irreparable harm."

4
TheFountainhead 4 points ago +4 / -0

But then the SC of PA refused to hear the case right? So basically we have to go to SCOTUS and hope we don’t get similar results?

When this is over, we need to impeach and remove some judges