Anyway you could add a motion to order investigation of straight ticket voting on the machines, specifically to examine if an “L” or an “I” was used to not count votes?
Republican
Versus
RepubIican
Not the same spelling.
Hence, Trump vote not counted if voting straight ticket.
This other stuff about machines switching the votes will be laughed out of court. Will need more evidence. Evidence that it was used in this Election. Not in Venezuela. This type of conspiracy requires many to be involved. But nobody has blown the whistle to collect the million dollar reward for exposing fraud.
There is no reason to laugh at votes being switched by machine. There is at least 3 separate video evidence taken from MSM live feed. There is recorded data evidence from Edison Research that shows many instances in many states of thousands of votes being switched, dropped and added, with each occurrence only benefitting one candidate, a statistical and logical impossibility. Accepted facts: Vote totals always increase not decrease. If it were a glitch, it would not only benefit one person. If a glitch happened that many times in that many states, any reasonable person would demand an audit for such an unreliable system.
There is plenty of evidence showing how easy these machines can be hacked locally or even overseas through internet connections and there is eye witness testimony by a poll challenger of the systems being connected with internet cables and internet symbol on screens showing they were online.
The graphs showing spikes in Biden going straight up in the middle of the night of Nov 3rd with little or no vote increase for Trump is incredibly compelling evidence. The chances of not having a trump vote but thousands of Biden votes in a row are zero. This happened multiple times. They always favoured one candidate. They stopped the counting in only the swing states at 3:00 am when trump’s lead was getting too big when the big jumps happened, the same way it was done in Venezuela according to witness there in on the fix who lives in America and has come forward. The only one who will be laughed out of a court room as the defense attorney trying to disprove this. This is why Sydney Powell is so confident in her case.
You forgot probably my favorite evidence of them all. 47 Election Machine USB's went missing from PA. What was on those USB's? Could it be, fake votes? https://youtu.be/t75xvZ3osFg
There is at least 3 separate video evidence taken from MSM live feed.
It is not clear where these News Channels are picking up the numbers displayed on the screen. Highly doubt that CNN is hooked up directly to the raw feed coming from polling stations.
More likely, these election workers counting the votes relay the numbers to some intermediate government election office. The news channels pick up the numbers from this government office and report it back to their TV station.
For all we know, these numbers on the screen could have been a reporting error from the news reporters.
Anyway you could add a motion to order investigation of straight ticket voting on the machines, specifically to examine if an “L” or an “I” was used to not count votes?
Republican
Versus
RepubIican
Not the same spelling.
Hence, Trump vote not counted if voting straight ticket.
Ballot harvesting is a winning argument.
This other stuff about machines switching the votes will be laughed out of court. Will need more evidence. Evidence that it was used in this Election. Not in Venezuela. This type of conspiracy requires many to be involved. But nobody has blown the whistle to collect the million dollar reward for exposing fraud.
There is no reason to laugh at votes being switched by machine. There is at least 3 separate video evidence taken from MSM live feed. There is recorded data evidence from Edison Research that shows many instances in many states of thousands of votes being switched, dropped and added, with each occurrence only benefitting one candidate, a statistical and logical impossibility. Accepted facts: Vote totals always increase not decrease. If it were a glitch, it would not only benefit one person. If a glitch happened that many times in that many states, any reasonable person would demand an audit for such an unreliable system.
There is plenty of evidence showing how easy these machines can be hacked locally or even overseas through internet connections and there is eye witness testimony by a poll challenger of the systems being connected with internet cables and internet symbol on screens showing they were online.
The graphs showing spikes in Biden going straight up in the middle of the night of Nov 3rd with little or no vote increase for Trump is incredibly compelling evidence. The chances of not having a trump vote but thousands of Biden votes in a row are zero. This happened multiple times. They always favoured one candidate. They stopped the counting in only the swing states at 3:00 am when trump’s lead was getting too big when the big jumps happened, the same way it was done in Venezuela according to witness there in on the fix who lives in America and has come forward. The only one who will be laughed out of a court room as the defense attorney trying to disprove this. This is why Sydney Powell is so confident in her case.
You forgot probably my favorite evidence of them all. 47 Election Machine USB's went missing from PA. What was on those USB's? Could it be, fake votes? https://youtu.be/t75xvZ3osFg
The argument is sound. But it won't be enough if there isn't enough time.
Somebody should call all the voters and ask them how they voted.
It is not clear where these News Channels are picking up the numbers displayed on the screen. Highly doubt that CNN is hooked up directly to the raw feed coming from polling stations.
More likely, these election workers counting the votes relay the numbers to some intermediate government election office. The news channels pick up the numbers from this government office and report it back to their TV station.
For all we know, these numbers on the screen could have been a reporting error from the news reporters.
Right, and we don’t. So we need a thorough scrutinizing of it.