I believe that was before Shiva did an update with the gateway pundit. The whole "analysis was bad" came from some so called youtube statistician trying to throw a wrench in his analysis.
Benford, as in Benford's Law, is a statistical method of detecting the possibility of fraud, not a particular living person performing statistical analysis relevant to this election.
If that is what you came away with from the follow-up then you obviously have no clue what he is talking about. At the very beginning he speaks on pattern analysis not statistics. His initial thesis wasn't wrong, and his follow-up was a better explanation of the initial.
You may want to reevaluate calling someone retarded because you can't understand the material.
I believe that was before Shiva did an update with the gateway pundit. The whole "analysis was bad" came from some so called youtube statistician trying to throw a wrench in his analysis.
I wrote up some information on it here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8lXhRrO/i-hope-that-the-trump-campaign-h/
Benford, as in Benford's Law, is a statistical method of detecting the possibility of fraud, not a particular living person performing statistical analysis relevant to this election.
If that is what you came away with from the follow-up then you obviously have no clue what he is talking about. At the very beginning he speaks on pattern analysis not statistics. His initial thesis wasn't wrong, and his follow-up was a better explanation of the initial.
You may want to reevaluate calling someone retarded because you can't understand the material.