GP has some value, but they need to stop publishing "everything". Verify first, then publish. Way too much misinformation is getting published by this outlet.
Limited resources.. I prefer a Hot press even when sometimes wrong....Its more like filtering through fresh intelligence its not all correct but it sharpens your mind to sort through it...
that is why all news outlets should have a comment section.
Absolutely.
...and precisely why so many prestigious publications removed theirs. They don't want to be questioned, which I think should be viewed under greater scrutiny than publications that happily publish things that may yet not be verified but are willing to be scrutinized.
The problem with Hoft is he can't resist embellishing and being tabloid. It pays the Bill's, has been too successful for him. His site is where we read, and then fo to the source to quote because he's poisoned his own reputation outside of base conservative circles due to the exaggerations and hyperbole inserted.
It can probably never be repaired, but he's valuable in the same way the NY Post is valuable. A place to start the dialog going.
GP has some value, but they need to stop publishing "everything". Verify first, then publish. Way too much misinformation is getting published by this outlet.
Limited resources.. I prefer a Hot press even when sometimes wrong....Its more like filtering through fresh intelligence its not all correct but it sharpens your mind to sort through it...
Their source is us. I think anyways, I mean I've seen article after article published by them just a few hours after something newbreaks on here.
I like TGP, but limited resources don't excuse some of the B.S. they print where even some minor research shows ot to be B.S.
Examples?
Yeah, I don’t trust them for that reason.
I do think their intentions are good -- they're not deliberately publishing misinformation -- but sometimes good intentions aren't good enough.
A buyer of information should always beware, that is why all news outlets should have a comment section. Rigorous debate finds the truth.
Absolutely.
...and precisely why so many prestigious publications removed theirs. They don't want to be questioned, which I think should be viewed under greater scrutiny than publications that happily publish things that may yet not be verified but are willing to be scrutinized.
The problem is Trust... Don't trust anything we living in an information war the fog of misinformation is everywhere...
Hoft has been staunchly supporting Trump for 5 years. He's got a tiny staff and a massive task.
At least he's willing to make public topics not one other outlet will touch.
Cool, but 50% of what Hoft and GP is doing is directly harmful to Trump and good for business in a very short term.
If Brietbart isn’t covering it, stand back because it’s WEAKLY sourced.
Breitbart has become a ghost of its former self. Andrew would puke if he were still breathing.
On what grounds? What about Breitbart has changed so much for you?
The problem with Hoft is he can't resist embellishing and being tabloid. It pays the Bill's, has been too successful for him. His site is where we read, and then fo to the source to quote because he's poisoned his own reputation outside of base conservative circles due to the exaggerations and hyperbole inserted.
It can probably never be repaired, but he's valuable in the same way the NY Post is valuable. A place to start the dialog going.
Bingo! “Everything” is not good. We need the verifiable truth.